Hi, need to submit a 1000 words essay on the topic What do you think Condorcet means when he claims that gender prejudice brings about an inequality fatal even to the party in whose favor it works Can

Hi, need to submit a 1000 words essay on the topic What do you think Condorcet means when he claims that gender prejudice brings about an inequality fatal even to the party in whose favor it works Can you provide evidence that supports this viewor negates it How might Mary Wollstonecraft have r.

His works evinced an interest in the political, social and religious future of his society. Let us dig deeper into the causes of such tyranny of injustice that destroys the future of the any part of the society that supports it.

He was absolutely optimistic about the future of the human race as he envisioned a society devoid of racism and a total destruction of prejudiced sects that are a main cause for inequality and division. He revoked such a broken state as a complete violation of pure inner strength and objected that every attempt to cover such brutal prevention of rights is vain and contemptuous. Interestingly, the journey that Condorcet depicts is that of a hopeful path from painful abuse and oppression to a hallway of enlightenment and equality. His works showcased a Utopian world that was free from tyranny and brought about ideas that were futuristic and promising for the aged with excellent education, decent work hours and a sophisticated lifestyle that was beyond their era. Had Condorcet been alive today, he would have certainly been hailed as the guru of the Information Era by digital experts.

His educational goals have a far reaching effect and witnessed sound judgment that is more attractive to today’s age. His ideology of fewer working hours with a smart pay sums up his thinking as being exceptional and unique for his day and age. He highlights three main inequalities such as those common to man – inequality in wealth, inequality in status and inequality in education.

Inequality in wealth – This kind of inequality sets a stage for absolute tyranny with the rich growing richer and the poor growing poorer. In such a society, there is no dearth of corruption as there is no set standard to earn wealth and live a life devoid of deceit and prejudice. It gives rise to ample reason for anarchy as the poorer sections of society are left uncared and forlorn in a constant bid by the government to hail the rich and hoard wealth at