Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hi, need to submit a 3500 words essay on the topic Consumer law.Thus, the court held. "it was possible that a business could deal as a consumer". On the surface it appears that the ruling in R &. B
Hi, need to submit a 3500 words essay on the topic Consumer law.
Thus, the court held. "it
was possible that a business could deal as a consumer". On the surface it appears that the
ruling in R &. B Customs totally contradicts the basis of the statues themselves, But upon
review, we see that the vehicle was in fact purchased for double use. partly for family
use, and partly for business use. The family use of the vehicle, coupled with the fact that
the purchaser was not in the car business influenced the courts decision to extend an
exception to the statue. So in the case of Andy, he would now be in accord with R &. B
Customs, he would now be classified as a consumer availing him of protection under
The applicable statues found in the UCTA and the SOGA. In that we have stratified him
and established his privilege to coverage as a consumer, we can approach the remaining
issues affecting the car and his likely remedy.
The only acknowledged car fault was with the brakes, and the dealer acknowledged
the fault by accepting a 400-pound reduction in his initial price. It was presumed by Andy
that a repair of the brakes would render the vehicle totally road worthy, thus of
satisfactory quality. And presumably place the sale in accord with the SGA. We find a
similar case in Bartlett v. Sydney Marcus (1965) the claimant purchased a second hand
car from the defendants and was advised that there was a minor problem with the clutch.
Being offered the option of purchasing the car at a reduced price and effecting the repairs
himself, or allowing the vendors to repair the car and paying full price, he chose to accept
the reduction and get the work done himself. This was indicated on the sale documents.
