Hi this assignment is The Standardisation Task has three sections: First, standardise the argument of Whitehouse. 300 words Second, construct a standardised argument of your own, responding to Whit

Hi 

this assignment is The Standardisation Task has three sections:

 First, standardise the argument of Whitehouse. 300 words 

Second, construct a standardised argument of your own, responding to Whitehouse’s

argument, and arguing for an opposing view. To develop your argument, you should

draw on the sources provided below. There are plenty of reasons given in these articles

that you could use to argue against Whitehouse. Please choose three main points you find

interesting, important or persuasive, and use these as the basis of your argument. Do not

use other sources for this assignment. Although your premises should draw on arguments

from the sources, they should all be presented in your own words.

The argument you construct must include at least three main premises, and at least two

subpremises in support of each main premise. At least one of your premises should

respond directly to some part of Whitehouse’s argument. 300 words 

Third, write 200 words about how you chose to respond to Whitehouse’s argument,

with reference to the radical or conservative nature of the claims you and Whitehouse

have made (in the sense discussed in lectures). Why did you choose to respond to the

claim(s) you did? Did you just respond to Whitehouse’s claims or have you introduced

new kinds of reasons? Why did you make that choice? Which parts of your argument

need the most evidence and why? You must list your word count for this section, or you

will be penalised. 

total words count is 800 words 

Please see the two attachments one is the article that you will need to get the answers for the task. The other attachment is the sample, please view the sample and make the task same as the sample one. thank you