Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Asylum and Human Rights. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Asylum and Human Rights. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. In deciding the refugee application, the UK administration will see that there exists well-founded fear which is crucial for the determination of refugee status. The objective aspect will examine the objective principles of the claim and also the subjective principle will examine whether there is any presence of a fear of the objective conditions (Harvey: 237). Thus, a refugee should demonstrate with concrete proof that they would suffer harassment if they return to their motherland. They should demonstrate that they would be subject to harassment or humiliation on logical grounds of persecution due to nationality, race, political ideologies, and religion.
In Adan v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Lord Slynn observed that well-founded fear must be present at the period when the claim for refugee status is to be determined. In the Sivakumaran case, the House of Lords observed that the fear of persecution must be contemporary if it is well-founded. Thus, the most crucial factor in deciding the refugee status in the UK is the Home Secretary’s evaluation of the narrations in the refugee application which will be considered concerning the situations that existed in the applicant’s country of origin (Harvey: 240).
In the .Sivakumaran case, the issues on Tamils in Sri Lanka and the House of Lords turned down the Court of Appeal’s acceptance of two tire tests favored by United States jurisprudence. The first is whether the individual is a refugee, and the second is that would their freedom or life be in jeopardy. The Court of Appeal applied a composite standard of a reasonable likelihood of real risk or harm to prove whether or not fear was tenable or well-founded and prevented a return to their motherland. In other parlance, the judges regarded the meaning of “well-founded fear” instead of “persecution”.
