Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Criminal Justice/Supreme Court Case Project: Individual Rights Perspective v. Crime Control Perspective. Prepare this assignment according to the guidel
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Criminal Justice/Supreme Court Case Project: Individual Rights Perspective v. Crime Control Perspective. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. The case was decided in 1981. It falls at 1 on the scale because it deals with individual rights. In this case, the police officers violated the defendant’s rights by obtaining a confession from him in the absence of his lawyer.
The case was decided in 1969. Rated 1on the scale since it deals with individual rights. It is wrong for the police to search a person’s house or property without a search warrant as this violates a person’s constitutional rights as stated in the Fourth amendment.
The case was decided in 2011. Rated 10 on the scale since it deals with crime control. The police had the right to follow the suspect to his complex because they suspected him of drug possession. By doing so, the police can be able to contain crime.
The case was decided in 1986. Rated 10 on the scale since it deals with crime control. The police have the right to take the confessions into evidence since this does not violate the due process as enshrined in the fourth amendment.
The case was decided in 2000. Rated 10 on the scale because it deals with crime control. Evasive and nervous behavior reveals to the police about the suspicious activity that the suspect might be doing.
The case was decided in 2006. Rated 1 on the scale because it deals with individual rights. even though the police had a valid search warrant, it is unconstitutional to enter someone property with his or her permission as this violates their rights.
The case was decided in 1973. Rated 10 on the scale since it deals with crime prevention. The police officers have the duty to protect citizens, driving with revoked licenses says a lot about the person’s behaviors.
The case was decided in 2012. Rated 1 on the scale because it deals with individual rights. The police violate a person’s rights when they install tracking device on a car in order to get incriminating evidence.
The case was decided in 1956. Rated 10 on the scale because it deals with crime control.
