I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Occupiers Liability Act of 1984. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Occupiers Liability Act of 1984. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Under normal circumstances, the law does not encourage trespassers on private property, and therefore, he is wholly responsible for his actions, along with the fact that he is quite aware of the risks and dangers lurking in the premises and that his actions may create compromises regarding his own health and safety. The very simple logic is that transgressors are well aware of the dangers their actions may raise, and therefore, they are themselves to blame for wrongful acts of intruding into another’s territory or privacy.

The laws relating to occupiers liability takes a wider and broader perspective of acts committed by children since they are perceived to take lesser care than adults. Therefore, it is seen that the laws need to take greater consideration of the acts committed by children. In this case, it is seen that the young person Liam (14 years) was in the company of an elder person, Chris, (20 years) who needed to exercise better control over her own action and that of her associate, Liam.

Again, the facts relating to this case needs to be seen from the point of view of whether the owners, Cygnemer County Council (CCC) owe a duty of care to Liam, Chris and Noelle, and if so, to what extent.

It is evident from this case that Liam, a minor, had violated the laws relating to Occupier’s liability and is a trespasser since he ignored the “No Trespassing” Board erected solely for the purpose of cautioning motor car enthusiasts from pursuing their motocross sports.

However, under the Occupier’s Liability Act 1984, the occupier has a duty of care, if he is aware of the latent risks in the premises, and knows full well that the other person, faces a grave risk, and there is need for the occupier to provide protection against such danger from the said premises.

It is also the duty of the occupier to offer protection whether the person is a trespasser or a legal visitor. In this case, it is seen that the occupier, Cygnemer County Council (CCC) did not offer the protection that was needed.