I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Research methods. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Research methods. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Literature Review Analysis Literature Review Analysis Is this a scholarly source? How do we know? Schweller’s work qualifies to be a scholarly source because he is an expert in the field of international security. His names and credentials are present on the first page of the paper. He is well versed with the subject he addresses, and his opinion is considered as a form of authority because of his experience and expertise. The publisher of the literature review is renowned, which publishes scholarly works in an effort to help researchers and students (Schweller, 1994). Moreover, a close analysis on the work reveals that he is addressing an informed audience of scholars, because he advances the knowledge the audience already has. The tone of the article also supports that he is addressing the literate class. In addition, the literature review presented is well referenced using footnotes, a factor that ascertains that it is scholarly.

2. What is the research question? What is the thesis?

The author explores the balancing and bandwagoning, as the two options that states have during conflicts. Schweller seeks to highlight the factors that motivate states to settle for any of the two alternatives. His thesis is very evident that balancing and bandwagoning are not opposites, and a range of different factors motivates states adopting either of them. The goals of balancing and bandwagoning are different as well, with states opting for bandwagon to gain something, while the purpose of balancing is ensuring that values are protected (p. 75).

3. What principle conclusions/conventional wisdom on this topic can we draw from the literature review?

From the literature review, it becomes evident that many scholars have not focused on exploring the issue of bandwagoning effectively. The author highlights that other authors who have tried to explore this topic previously have misconceived the concepts of bandwagoning. The literature review highlights that rewards are of central significance to states that opt for bandwagoning. It emerges that other reasons also prompt states to consider bandwagoning as the preferred option. The theory of the balance of interests is more realistic in explaining bandwagoning (p. 100).

4. What prompts Schweller to believe that the literature is not complete on this topic? What gap is he filling?

Schweller believes that the topic of bandwagoning has not been explored as it deserves. This is because the balancing theory that has often been used in explaining this concept seems insufficient. Moreover, the goals of bandwagoning have not been explained in details as required. He discerns the need for the development of new theories that can effectively explain the concept (p. 105). In his literature review, he focuses on filling this gap. He does this by reviewing the balancing theory, and explaining the reasons that prompt states to opt for bandwagoning. He then presents an alternative theory that fits the concept of bandwagoning.

5. How is the literature review organized?

The literature review is organized in sections. The first section presents the balancing versus bandwagoning concepts the second sections present a critique of the balancing theory. The third section describes the rewards and their role in bandwagoning. The next section of the article tackles other reasons for bandwagoning. Finally, the author presents his alternative theory.

Reference

Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security, 19 (1), 72.