I need help creating a thesis and an outline on The South Carolina nullification crisis, under President Andrew Jackson, split the Democratic Party in two. Prepare this assignment according to the gui

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on The South Carolina nullification crisis, under President Andrew Jackson, split the Democratic Party in two. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. The argument passes Fallacy of Exclusive Premises because there is only one negative premise. It passes the Affirmative Conclusion from a Negative Premise Fallacy because the conclusion is negative. The Existential Fallacy is passed because there is no particular conclusion from two universal premises.

First Argument:

All South Carolinians(d) supported state’s rights(u).

Some Southern Democrats(u) did not support the state’s rights(d).

Some Sothern Democrats(u) were not supported by South Carolinians(d).

Mood, Figure, and Latin Name: AOO-2 Baroko

Venn Diagram:

This argument passes all six tests for validity. It passes the Equivocation Fallacy because there are only three terms used in the exact same way. It passes the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle because the middle term is distributed in the second premise. It passes the Illicit Major and Illicit Minor Fallacies because the major term is distributed in the first premise and in the conclusion. The argument passes the Fallacy of Exclusive Premises because there are not two negative premises. It passes the Affirmative Conclusion from a Negative Premise Fallacy because the conclusion is negative. Finally, it passes the Existential Fallacy because there is no particular conclusion from two universal conclusions.

Second Argument:

No nullificationp(d) was constitutionalm(d).

All protective tariffss(d) were constitutionalm(u).

No protective tariffss(d) could be nullifiedp(d).

Mood, Figure, and Latin Name: EAE-2 Cesare

Venn Diagram:

This argument is valid based on the fact that it passes all six tests for validity. The Equivocation Fallacy is passed because there are only three terms used in the same way. The Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle Term is passes because the middle term is distributed in the first premise. The Fallacies of the Illicit Major or Illicit Minor are passed because any term distributed in the conclusion is distributed in the premises. It passes the Affirmative Conclusion from Negative Premises Fallacy because the conclusion is negative so there is no affirmative conclusion. The Existential Fallacy is passed because there is no particular conclusion from two universal premises.