Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on What is the role of jury science in the courtroom Jury science involves the use of social science to choose jurors with tools such as community attitudi
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on What is the role of jury science in the courtroom Jury science involves the use of social science to choose jurors with tools such as community attitudinal surveys, focus groups, jury consultants, and investigating jurors. Research this topic and determ. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Jury Science in the Courtroom No: What is the role of jury science in the courtroom? Jury science involves the use of social science to choose jurors with tools such as community attitudinal surveys, focus groups, jury consultants, and investigating jurors. Research this topic and determine if the use of these tools gives either side an advantage in a trial. If it does give one side an advantage, does the side with the most money have a better chance of winning? .
In the American legal system, jury selection specifically points out to the tools of social science and expertise to select an expert on the subject as per the policy in vogue when the counsels are having the opportunities to examine jurors at the time of trial. It is the prerogative of the lawyers and the judge to choose the fit and appropriate people to be on the jury (Barber, 1994).
The selection criteria of jurors aim at to find out the citizens who are eligible to examine in a particular case of law under oath. The objective of selecting jurors is just to have effective voting preferences (Barber, 1994).
The initiation of scientific way to select jurors amongst the appropriate people to be examined in a particular case pending before the competent court of law initially created sensation in the legal fraternity. Though the juror selection process is an effective way to come to the conclusion but it does not receive appreciation from the American people in general and legal fraternity in particular. The old system of selecting juror was doubtful since it was based on nepotism and favoritism. Those responsible selecting jurors had their own axe to grind thus making the whole process of selecting jurors biased (Barber, 1994).
The present process of selecting juror is based on the survey conducted by different but reliable groups of society, the rating of the people chosen for juror. The relevant information is gathered through a detailed questionnaire. It helps out the attorney and the judge to select the right person for the right job (Barber, 1994).
In our considered opinion if this system of selecting juror (amongst the best and competent citizens) adopted in its true spirit would play an effective role in arriving a fair and just decision in a particular case of law. This would be a source of satisfaction by the either side of the litigants. Deviation from mentioned healthy practices may attract money to win the case by the wealthy and the affluent segment of the society. If this practice is taken place, it would be a serious dent to the legal system (Barber, 1994).
References
Barber, Jeremy W. (1994). The Jury is Still Out: The Role of Jury Science in Modern American Court Room. American Criminal Law Review 6 (22).
