I need help with research paper for mental health. Topic: depression, self-efficacy and adherence in patient with type 2 diabeteshttp://www.npjournal.org/article/S1555-4155(14)00519-4/pdf link for the

I need help with research paper for mental health. Topic: depression, self-efficacy and adherence in patient with type 2 diabetes

http://www.npjournal.org/article/S1555-4155(14)00519-4/pdf link for the research topic

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR326 Mental Health Nursing

Guidelines for Scholarly Article Review

PURPOSE

The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health nursing topic.

COURSE OUTCOMES

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO #5 Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO #5)

CO #7 Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making. (PO #6)

CO #9 Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO #8)

DUE DATE: See Course Calendar. The college’s Late Assignment Policy applies to this activity.

POINTS POSSIBLE: 100 points

REQUIREMENTS

Select a scholarly nursing or research article (published within the last five years) related to mental health nursing, which includes content related to evidence-based practice.

*** You may need to evaluate several articles before you find one that is appropriate. ***

Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article. Submit the article for approval.

Write a 2–3 page paper (excluding the title and reference pages) using the following criteria.

Write a brief introduction of the topic and explain why it is important to mental health nursing.

Cite statistics to support the significance of the topic.

Summarize the article; include key points or findings of the article.

Discuss how you could use the information for your practice; give specific examples.

Identify strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Discuss whether you would recommend the article to other colleagues.

Write a conclusion.

Paper must follow APA format. Include a title page and a reference page; use 12-point Times Roman font; and include in-text citations (use citations whenever paraphrasing, using statistics, or quoting from the article). Please refer to your APA Manual as a guide for in-text citations and sample reference pages.

Submit per faculty instructions by due date (see Course Calendar); attach article with the review.

DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA

Assignment

Criteria

Points

%

Description

Introduction

10

10

An effective introduction establishes the purpose of the paper.

The introduction should capture the attention of the reader.

Article summary

30

30

Summary of article must include the following.

Statistics to support the significance of the topic

Key points and findings of the article

Discussion of how information from the article could be used in your practice (give specific examples)

Article critique

30

30

Article critique must include the following.

Strengths and weaknesses of the article

Discussion of whether you would recommend the article to a colleague

Conclusion

15

15

The conclusion statement should be well defined and clearly stated.

An effective conclusion provides analysis and/or synthesis of information, which relates to the main idea/topic of the paper. The conclusion is supported by ideas presented throughout the body of your report.

Article Selection & Approval

5

5

Article is relevant to mental health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

Grammar/Spelling/

Mechanics

APA format

10

10

Correct use of Standard English grammar and sentence structure

No spelling or typographical errors

Document includes title and reference pages

Citations in the text and reference page

Total

100

100

GRADING RUBRIC

Assignment

Criteria

Outstanding or Highest

Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of

Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory

Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or

Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F (0–75%)

Introduction (10 points)

Introduction is present and distinctly establishes the purpose of paper.

Introduction is appealing and promptly captures the attention of the reader. 10 points

Introduction is present and generally establishes the purpose of paper

Introduction has appeal and generally captures the attention of the reader. 9 points

• Introduction is present andgenerally establishes the purpose of paper.

8 points

• No introduction

0–7 points

Article summary (30 points)

Statistics presented strongly support the significance of the topic

Key points and findings of the article are clearly stated

Thoroughly discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by giving two or more specific, relevant examples.

28–30 points

Statistics presented moderately support the significance of the topic

Key points and findings of the article are vaguely stated

Adequately discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by one specific, relevant, example.

26-27 points

Statistics presented weakly support the significance of the topic

Key points and findings of the article are stated in a manner

that is confusing or difficult to understand

Briefly discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by giving examples that are not specific, yet remain relevant.

23- 25 points

Statistics presented do not support the significance of the topic OR no statistics are presented.

Key points and findings of the article are incorrectly presented OR missing

Briefly discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by giving examples that are neither specific, nor relevant. OR implications to practice not discussed.

0-22 points

Assignment

Criteria

Outstanding or Highest

Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of

Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory

Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or

Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F (0–75%)

Article critique

(30 points)

Excellent critique of article demonstrating analysis and original thinking

Strengths and weaknesses of the article thoroughly examined

Recommendations of the article to a colleague show thoughtful application of critical thinking

28–30 points

Adequate critique of article demonstrating analysis and original thinking

Strengths and weaknesses of the article briefly examined

Recommendations of the article to a colleague show elements of critical thinking

26-27 points

Critique of article present and demonstrates understanding of the article’s contents

Strengths and weaknesses of the article minimally examined

Recommendations of the article to a colleague show thoughtful application of critical thinking

23- 25 points

Critique of article does not relate to content of article OR missing

Strengths and weaknesses of the article NOT examined

Recommendation of the article made to an inappropriate colleague OR not made

0-22 points

Conclusion

(15 points)

The conclusion statement is well-defined and clearly stated.

Conclusion demonstrates comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

The conclusion is strongly supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

14-15 points

The conclusion statement is general and clearly stated.

Conclusion demonstrates comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

The conclusion is strongly supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

13 points

The conclusion statement is general and clearly stated.

Conclusion demonstrates adequate analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

The conclusion is adequately supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

12 points

The conclusion statement is vague or not stated.

Conclusion demonstrates inadequate analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

The conclusion is inadequately supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

0–11 points

Article Selection &

Approval

(5 Points)

ALL Items MET:

Article is relevant to mental health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

5 points

ONE item NOT MET:

Article is relevant to mental health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

4 points

2 or more items NOT MET:

Article is relevant to mental health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

0-3 points

Assignment

Criteria

Outstanding or Highest

Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of

Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory

Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or

Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F (0–75%)

Grammar/Spelling/M

echanics APA format

(10 points)

References are submitted with assignment.

Used appropriate APA format and are free of errors.

Includes title and reference pages.

Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

10 points

References are submitted with assignment.

Used appropriate APA format, but has one type of error.

Includes title and reference pages.

Grammar and mechanics have one type of error.

9 points

References are submitted with assignment.

Used appropriate APA format, but have two types of errors.

Includes title and reference pages.

Grammar and mechanics have two types of errors.

8 points

No references submitted with assignment.

Attempts made to use APA format, but have three or more types of errors.

Includes title and reference pages.

Grammar and mechanics have three or more types of errors.

0–7 points

Total Points Possible = 100 points