Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I need some assistance with these assignment. discipline in the public schools Thank you in advance for the help!
I need some assistance with these assignment. discipline in the public schools Thank you in advance for the help! The case was tried at Supreme Court, and the Tinker family won the case. The Supreme Court gave the ruling that the school official does not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate" .(TINKER vs DES MOINES DISTRICT SCHOOL). However, the Court further added that the right to freedom of choice must be maintained within limits. It should not in any way disturb class activity or invade the rights of others. This case's impact had been huge for the next years, and many times the Tinker reference was used in courts. One such instance was when the school suspended Mathew Fraser of Bethel High School for giving a speech containing sexual innuendos. The Court, however, favored the school, and the suspension has upheld a speech containing sexual innuendos. The Court remarked that it was fair for the school to suspend the student using vulgar language within school boundaries. .(Jacobs)
The Tinker case edges on the boundary of what is right and what is not. It depends on the situation and the way people use their rights given to them by the constitution. The Tinker family wore black armbands in dispute of the war against Vietnam, but it was not an invasion of school guidelines handed to students. Action is a means of destruction, no matter for whatever reasons it is fought. It takes the lives of innocent people. It has been seen today that even football players wear black armbands to condemn racism. In 2002, people went out on the streets to condemn attacks on Afghanistan, but it was only a movement in which people took part .(Pinto). Nothing violent took place. The same was the case with the Tinker family.
They just wore armbands in protest of the war and possibly side more students with them and show the State that the youth is not supporting the cause. It was not an act of violence. There was massive unrest among the American public in response to the Vietnam War, in general. .(Hodbod'ova'). So, the Tinker family stood right in the case.
If the case were tried in 2012, the decision would have stayed the same. In the twenty first century, people have much more freedom of choice and speech. We have seen many times people coming out on the street and not supporting the cause, such as the War against Terror in Afghanistan .(Pinto).
