Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I need some assistance with these assignment. the correlation between the notion of state aggression, the retaliatory effect that state will create on other states Thank you in advance for the help!
I need some assistance with these assignment. the correlation between the notion of state aggression, the retaliatory effect that state will create on other states Thank you in advance for the help! The structural theories of International Relations aim at raising their safety and therefore conform to the complete guidelines of the game and universal rules. At times, they are expected to cause a corresponding reaction by states in the structure that could reduce their individual security (Salehyan, 2007).
In spite of this, there are systems of state conduct that show an indifference to international rules and the inferred stress of socialization. Support for violent non- state actors like revolutions or revolutionary organizations that are in conflict with others are one of the patterns of this theory. This kind of policy means that a highly hostile attitude and tolerates the supporting country. The risk here is becoming an exile in the international system and a target of other nation’s retaliation (Salehyan, 2007). States behave the way they do because of their general interest. The behavior changes because of sentimentality, or because of the individual desires of directors. They normally do not act to spread theoretical causes, like the development of democracy, the development of human rights, or the respectable will of human beings.
International law researchers differentiate between normal and ergaomnes norms. These types of rules prescribe movement and the dissimilarity between enforcement. If country X participates in the activity that interrupts a norm and country Y is affected by that action, only nation Y has a rightful claim in contradiction to X. Therefore, only country Y has the privilege to involve in countermeasures contrary to Y. If country X takes part in an action that disrupts an ergaomnes rule, all the countries have lawful claims in opposition to X. Therefore, all counties have the right to take part in countermeasures (Atkinson and Polivy, 1976). .
