I will pay for the following article Australia's Role in the Campaign against Global Terrorism. The work is to be 8 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

I will pay for the following article Australia's Role in the Campaign against Global Terrorism. The work is to be 8 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Academics within the Social Sciences and Humanities departments have put forward a broad range of views on the Twenty-First-century affliction that is global terrorism.&nbsp. While the United States has taken upon itself the prime responsibility of waging “war on terror”, the rest of the world is not so sure about its intentions.&nbsp. There are exceptions, of course, and there is no surprise in the fact that Britain and Australia have continued their long-standing position as junior partners to American initiatives – diplomatic or military.&nbsp. This is a tradition that has its origins in the common Anglo-Saxon roots of the respective nations’ elite. While joining the American led ‘Coalition of the Willing’ might help boost the Australian economy, there is more to the issue than just prosperity.

The two nations targeted for terrorists or their perceived threats are Afghanistan and Iraq. Both nations are now in dismal social and economic conditions. Its civilians are drenched in conditions of poverty and a state of misery and despair. For people surviving in refugee camps, the idea of being agents of terrorism is very appealing. It is understandable: rather than dying of starvation after being humiliated and dispossessed, it is far nobler to give up one’s life voluntarily (Bendle, 2004, p.115). There is pride in martyrdom for the surviving Afghans and Iraqis (although there is no evidence of Iraqi hand in any of the terrorist acts of the last few years). So, the Australian mission of curbing terrorism by bombing innocent civilians will only lead to escalating terrorist acts. This self-defeating logic employed by the Australian government is bound to back-fire sooner than later. Rather, the Australian policymakers will be better advised to wage wars on poverty eradication, for environmental protection, etc, which are more pressing necessities that the one in a discussion (De Castro, 2004, p.193).