I will pay for the following article Critique of Whistle-blowing. The work is to be 6 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

I will pay for the following article Critique of Whistle-blowing. The work is to be 6 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. In most cases, an employee cannot suffer a dismissal because of whistleblowing, since this is would amount to unfair dismissal. In other words, the law will protect them if there was a fulfilment of certain standards. These standards are known as the qualifying disclosures. Normally, the individuals protected include agency workers, employees, individuals who are training with an employer and have not yet gotten employment, and supervised self-employed workers. An employee is only entitled to protection if they sincerely feel that whatever they are reporting is factual and they feel they are informing the right person. In addition, the whistleblower must also believe that their exposure is in the interest of the public. Employees are, however not protected from dismissal when they break the law while reporting misconduct. For instance, when an employee had earlier on signed the Official Secrets Act, or when the misconduct became discoverable in an event whereby another person was seeking legal advice. Moreover, those workers who are not employed have no right of claiming unfair dismissal, but they receive protection and can allege ‘detrimental treatment’ (Weiss,45). Generally, whistleblowing ensures public safety (Arszułowicz and Wojciech, 153). One major reason why whistleblowers reveal misconduct is to protect the public, their colleagues, and the company from risks. They are instant and the more important the risk is, the more essential it is to take action competently. When an organization engages itself in activities that can cause mental or physical harm to the public or environmental destruction, it is always important that someone take responsibility in ensuring such activities come to the spotlight.&nbsp.Moreover, whistleblowing also ensures moral responsibility. Whistleblowing out of a sense of moral responsibility is itself an important path to take. In this case, an employee should consider whatever motivates them before blowing the whistle. Therefore, one is justified if they attempt to accomplish a sense of moral responsibility or protect the interest of the public. Good motivation for action is therefore justifiable in the case of whistleblowing.&nbsp.