I will pay for the following article Terrorism, Social Stigma and Ethics in Law Enforcers. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

I will pay for the following article Terrorism, Social Stigma and Ethics in Law Enforcers. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Police officers are now using most of their resources and time for training in readiness for future possible terrorist attacks. The police are also gathering information and intelligence needed to prevent and stop terrorist attacks. The police’s responsibility for emergency response to terrorism takes precedence over other duties (Delattre 2006).

Disagreements have emerged following the 2001 terrorist attacks. One of such disagreements is how much information and intelligence should federal agencies share with the police and state. The point of sharing information results from the fact that the FBI holds their information too much. Criminal information and intelligence must be shared across jurisdictions and agencies in the country. It results from the fact that information sharing is crucial in effecting antiterrorism. Police officers interact with the society that enables them to exchange information and gather intelligence. The intelligence and information gathered are important to other agencies including the FBI (Delattre 2006).

While still in their line of duty, police officers are required to exhibit the recommended law enforcement behaviors in fighting terrorism and maintaining personal liberties. Disagreements have arisen on how the police ought to operate when collecting intelligence on terrorism. While part of their function is protecting civil liberty, there is rising criticism on how terrorism suspects should be handled. There are disagreements on the use of force in gathering information related to terrorist activities. Using force means that the police will torture individuals while gathering information. Using torture while interrogating people and suspects are wrong as the officers will be acting against their basic responsibility of upholding the people’s personal liberties (Delattre, 2006).