I will pay for the following article Work Breakdown Structure in Project Management. The work is to be 11 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

I will pay for the following article Work Breakdown Structure in Project Management. The work is to be 11 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Some of its advantages are the following:

A typical construction project involves a WBS that evolves from an initial task that is successively subdivided into smaller work blocks until the lowest level is reached, indicating a tree-like structure. Subdividing the project breaks down the project work effort into packages that are both manageable and independent. It connotes that the lowest level of the package corresponds to the smallest project work, which requires the shortest completion time periods. As WBS shows the relationship of all elements of a project, a sound basis for cost and schedule control is provided.

Some lists of project activities involved in WBS include budgeting, cost allocation, time allocation and management, and quality assurance. These are being ensured in the process of work packages. A well-designed WBS often consists of software, hardware, services, data, and facilities (Zachman 1987).

Since WBS breaks down the work project into subdivisions in a tree-like structure, the classification format of work packages may include cost centre, fields for responsibility, activity numbering, and so on. A description of the tasks purported to be performed is generated for each element of the WBS, in which each task is diverse from the others.

Due to its being process-oriented, the WBS approach is convenient for activity definition, which is the starting step for project planning.