Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following essay Discuss the situation in criminal law in England when both the prosecution and the defendant in the same case cause a delay. The essay is to be 2 pages with three to
I will pay for the following essay Discuss the situation in criminal law in England when both the prosecution and the defendant in the same case cause a delay. The essay is to be 2 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
The case brought to the limelight the prevalent child abuse that has recently domineered Britain. The former abattoir worker and lifeguard, according to previous evidence, had murdered, obscured, and disposed the body of the child to ensure that any search by the police will be futile. As the case was proceeding, the prosecution found fresh evidence2. Fragments of bones confirmed to be April’s remains were found in the man’s bath plughole and fireplace. Additionally, explicit images of child sex abuse were found in Mark’s laptop, a fact that prompted a fresh debate over a link between viewing of such images and sexual killings. The prosecution had also discovered, through detectives, several tapes in Mark’s DVD player, tapes that were dominated with murder and rape. April’s family wanted Mark’s cottage demolished while the prosecution wanted him to explain the source of the tapes and the bones. The prosecution believed that it could garner more evidence against Mark if given more time. The lead prosecutor also said that, “computer evidence points towards an individual who is evil, manipulative and has premeditated3.” The prosecution team, therefore, wanted more time to gather parts of the girl’s body. Mark wanted more time to defend the new evidence that had emerged. Upon examination of the reasons for discontinuation presented by both the defendant and the prosecutor, Mold crown court judges issued discontinuance.
The defendants were indicted of murdering Hama Faraj Noori, 56, in his flat after executing the murder plan in a bar. The defendants claimed that they were not ready to defense themselves and the judge allowed them more time to establish a legal team. The defendants had realized that the prosecutor had garnered fresh evidence that would prove quite challenging to defend and wanted more time to assemble facts of the case and conduct some consultations with the relevant authorities4. Moreover, the prosecution wanted more
