I will pay for the following essay Fusing Creativity: Cultural Metacognition and Teamwork in Multicultural Teams. The essay is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a re

I will pay for the following essay Fusing Creativity: Cultural Metacognition and Teamwork in Multicultural Teams. The essay is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

This paper affirms that the literature review section of the “Fusing Creativity: Cultural Metacognition and Teamwork in Multicultural Teams” has done a comprehensive research on many of the previous works. In their literature review the authors have taken a step-by-step approach towards the problem. They have defined a team and their definition of the multicultural teams. The predominant stress has been given towards the regional difference of the person for the convenience of the research. In this section they have also tried to state the nature of their research. In the next section the researchers have tried to identify the impact of teamwork on the creativity of the output. They have shown how previous researches have emphasized the importance of different types of discussion between the team and how that enriches the outcome. These practices ultimately enhance the final decision obtained. They have also discussed about the importance of discussion in a group and the freedom and willingness of each member to share their novel ideas in reaching a creative solution. Then the authors have discussed the previous researches on the variety of ideas that can come to the table in due to the cultural difference of the team and their resultant perception, visualization and conceptualization of their role and the problem. The nature of interaction of the members of a multi-cultured team has been discussed with clarity. They have also considered the researches on the importance of fusion in such a team against the dominance of a subgroup for the creativity of a team.

The other principle considered is the importance of participation and fusion. The authors have considered the salient concepts in the previous researches though criticism in the form of weaknesses or lack in the considered literatures has not been done. The paper has also restricted the definition of cultural difference to regional difference. The authors have pointed out this limitation. (Crotty, &amp. Brett 4 -7) The research questions were based on the creativity, fusion in the team, cultural metacognition and other control variables. The question for measuring creativity was inspired from the Chatman’s question of 1998. However in this research the question have been further developed. The researchers have created two questions to address the novelty of the solution and the utility of the solution for the organization. The questions to evaluate fusion were generated from a pilot project conducted in an MBA classroom. In this section the questions asked were related to the norms and practices of the team based on their cultural difference and the degree to which the different members of the team gel with each other. The questions tried to understand the participation of the team in the decision making process and the level of consensus reached. The questions for cultural metacognition were adopted from the Earley and Ang’s questions in 1993. They were designed to understand the consciousness of the member of the existent cultural difference in his team. They also tried to measure the degree of adjustment of the person and their efforts to take into account the cultural difference of their colleagues. For the control variables the questions were modeled on the Gladstein scale that was created by Vegt, Emans and Viliert in 2003. The questions tried to understand the degree of satisfaction and comfort of the members working in a multicultural team. Some of the questions were created on the basis of a pilot project. The research also considered other questions to test the other variables like the age, sex, number of members in the team, the mode of communication, the number of times the team met each year and the responsibilities of the team.