Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following essay The Creation of a Corporate Security Management Strategy: Organizational Survival. The essay is to be 12 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and
I will pay for the following essay The Creation of a Corporate Security Management Strategy: Organizational Survival. The essay is to be 12 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
In the wake of the 21st century, the world has witnessed new and challenging security issues for all multi-national enterprises and governments alike (Strzelecki, M 2008), from the hugely damaging windstorms and flooding in Europe and the ice storms witnessed in Canada, to the new breeds of diseases for both humans and animals (OECD 2003). Apart from that, the 21st century has also been vile with a host of security threats and disasters in harrowing magnitudes, including terrorist attacks such as the September 11 attack on the US in 2001, and other major breakdowns of critical infrastructures due to cyber-attacks or technical failures making news headlines all over the world (Lehto, M 2013). Over the past 20 years, many scholars have been interested in examining the continuously shifting global security environment because of globalization in general, but very little research has been dedicated to the emerging security risks threatening business in the 21st century and the prevailing corporate security management strategies (Goldin, Ian 2010). However, over the past five years following the collapse of financial markets during the 2008 financial crisis, the concept of systemic risk (the type of threat that spreads rapidly across countries and organizations) has gripped public attention attracting a vast volume of research. Nonetheless, the prevailing research in the field of systemic risk is not exhaustive, particularly because of numerous shortcomings in the empirical measures and/or methodology used in previous studies namely the “Too Big To Fail” (TBTF) and the “Too Interconnected To Fail” tests. Additionally, much of this research is biased and limited in concept because it tends to think of systemic risk only in terms of financial institutions such as banks. However, the elimination of intermediaries today implies that multi-national corporations can now access funds from the capital market without going through the banks or all other intermediary-institutions.