I will pay for the following essay Theory of Dispute Resolution. The essay is to be 9 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.Facts of the case According to the l

I will pay for the following essay Theory of Dispute Resolution. The essay is to be 9 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

Facts of the case According to the law of supply of goods and services, there are certain implied terms during the transfer of goods from the transferor to the transferee, most important being that the goods transferred are of good quality and fitness. This means that the transferor of goods has the obligation to ensure that all the goods transferred to the transferee are of satisfactory quality, and therefore, will perform their desired functions without failing. Thus according to this law, transfer of faulty goods from the seller to the buyer is an offence. According to the facts of this case, Frontway Clutches Ltd. Sold repair parts to Mr. Conn, who is a garage owner, which turned out to be faulty, and thus inappropriate to fulfill their intended purpose. Consequently, he bears the responsibility of compensating the other party, namely Mr. McScrooge. However, the facts under this case are complicated by the fact that the substance or the commodity under dispute is unavailable for examination, which is an essential step towards proving the inappropriateness of the commodities supplied by Frontway Clutches Ltd. While Frontway Clutches Ltd. could be required to compensate Mr. ...

McScrooge’s van, then he might bear the responsibility. Additionally, the burden of responsibility would even be bigger for the supplier, if the supplier was aware that the clutches that were sold to Mr. Conn were faulty. Therefore, while the substance of this case would majorly revolve around the quality and fitness of the commodity sold, the law would also be interested in discovering the intentions and the awareness of the parties involved in the sale and fixation of the car clutch. Liabilities of the parties involved Mr. Conn is the ultimate center of conflict in this case, considering that he is the one responsible for fixing the clutch that failed in Mr. McScrooge van, while on the other hand he had received the clutch from Frontway Clutches Ltd., without suspecting that the clutches had any problem. He remains in the center of dispute because. he is required to pay for the extra expenditure incurred by Mr. McScrooge, yet he is not responsible for the supply of the default clutch. While he would like to pass on the responsibility to Frontway Clutches Ltd., it proves difficult since he does not have the faulty clutch that would act as the evidence. In this case, all the parties involved in the dispute have made certain errors, which leave all the parties liable. First, Frontway Clutches Ltd. Supplied faulty clutches to Mr. Conn, thus the supplier is responsible for failure that occurred in Mr. McScrooge’s van. Second, even though Mr. McScrooge suffered the failure of the clutch, he did not present it to Mr. Conn as the evidence that the clutch he had fixed in his van was faulty. This passes the burden of error on to Mr.