Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following essay Trials of conventional criminals and terrorists. The essay is to be 3 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.ition (in all of
I will pay for the following essay Trials of conventional criminals and terrorists. The essay is to be 3 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
ition (in all of its senses, military or paramilitary, solutions, specialist courts or tribunals.” (Renwick & Treverton, p.1) Conventional criminals mostly commit crimes in their own country and hence the trials of such criminals are easy for the court. On the other hand in most of the cases terrorist commit crime in another country and hence their trial often poses lot of headaches to the court.
Four essentials of a conventional criminal trial system are: strong and independent prosecutors. efficient and properly paid defence lawyers. ready access by defence lawyers to their clients in custody. and a modern communications system. (Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales) Conventional trial of a criminal often conducted in a criminal or magistrate court with the help of a judge, prosecutors, criminal advocates, witnesses etc. The judge will hear the claims of both the prosecution advocate and the criminal advocate before reaching the conclusion and declaring whether the accused committed any crime or not. In order to convince the judge the advocates (prosecution and criminal) usually presents evidences and witnesses along with the first information report (FIR) by the police who investigated the crime. The advocates will cross exam the evidences and the witnesses in order to prove their arguments. Finally the judge will reach a conclusion after hearing and evaluating all the arguments and evidences and will declare his verdict.
Trial of a terrorist usually involves lot of complicated procedures. Quiet often special courts have been put up in order to conduct a proper and fair trial for the crime conducted by the terrorists. “In deciding whether to charge suspected terrorists, and in conducting their trials, prosecutors have difficult choices to make while maintaining proper standards of conduct. The first question, however, is how and in what context terrorists should be prosecuted.” (Renwick & Treverton, p.10)
“Civilian courts do not provide