Imagine that you want to argue for a national educational campaign promoting the cutting of porkn-that is, spending projects benefiting a

Imagine that you want to argue for a national educational campaign promoting the cutting of "porkn-that is, spending projects benefiting a particular state or congressional district that are added to the federal budget mainly to get incumbents reelected. Your campaign will be composed of television ads scheduled to air before and during the Super Bowl-and you want the Democratic and Republican national committees to pay for those ads. Make a list of reasons and evidence to support your claim, aimed simultaneously at political bigwigs from both parties. What kind of evidence would be most compelling to that mixed group? How would you rethink your use of evidence if you were writing for the newsletter of a community of retirees or for your student newspaper, urging political activism to cut out-of-control spending by politicians?