Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.

QUESTION

In o'connor v. consolidated coin caterers corp., the court of appeal held that:​ a. ​none of the above. b. ​the adea did not require the employer to demonstrate any intention to discriminate. c.

In o'connor v. consolidated coin caterers corp., the court of appeal held that:​

a. ​none of the above.

b. ​the adea did not require the employer to demonstrate any intention to discriminate.

c. ​whether the replacement was over or under 40 years of age was irrelevant.

d. ​the adea does not provide for disparate impact cases against older officers.

Show more
LEARN MORE EFFECTIVELY AND GET BETTER GRADES!
Ask a Question