In the concepts reviewed in Unit 1 through Unit 4, it is important to understand that the full and proper application of the risk management process should generate a range of information and data tha

In the concepts reviewed in Unit 1 through Unit 4, it is important to understand that the full and proper application of the risk management process should generate a range of information and data that needs to be stored and reviewed, thus, establishing the need for an effective Communication strategy when managing a project. Development of your Communication approach includes understanding WHO your audience is, WHAT you need to communicate, and the OBJECTIVE you hope to achieve with the information shared.

Applying your understanding of how to effectively Communicate Risks and Plan outcomes in the scope of a project do you recall a time when important information was shared with you (public or private) and how you received perceived this information?

In your response, consider the following:

1. How did you receive the information? What is good or bad news?
2. Do you believe you were the right person to receive the information? Why or Why Not?
3. Was the communication approach taken effective? Why or Why Not?
4. If the tables were turned, how would you have approached the communication of the same information

In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Discussion Board Reminders:

• Must have 3 posts: A main post and two replies to peers.
  • First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week.
  • Second and third post:Must be posted on a different day from the first post.
• Connect to content: At least 1 post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boardsfor help with connecting to the content.
• Engaging in class discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards.

Assignment CriteriaProficient DescriptorPoints

Quality of Main Post

16PointsTotal

Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements:

• Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (4 points)
• Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (4 points)
• Delivers a thoughtfulresponse demonstrating insights and reflections (4 points)
• Connects to both key content conceptsand personal experiences (4 points)

/16 pts.

Response to Peers

16 PointsTotal

Responds to a minimum of 2 peers (8 points per response)

• Substantiveresponse (4 points)
• Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (4 points):
  • Provides additional resources
  • Connects to key concepts
  • Shares personal or professional experiences
  • Contributes new information or perspective
  • Presents a competing viewpoint

/16 pts.

Support from Learning Resources

4PointsTotal

At least one post refers tocourse learning resources./4 pts.

Professional Writing

4points

Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.

Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others./4 pts.Total40 points possible/40 pts.

NEED HELP?

FACULTY

Sladan Sinanovic

Looking for tutoring?Free, online, 24/7 tutoring on a variety of subjects. Go to Smarthinking >>