In this discussion, we will explore the presence of argumentative writing techniques in the first six chapters of either "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald or "The Things They Carried" by Tim O

In this discussion, we will explore the presence of argumentative writing techniques in the first six chapters of either "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald or "The Things They Carried" by Tim O'Brien. Both of these novels contain elements of argumentation, where the authors present and support their viewpoints or ideas through the narrative. We will focus on the following aspects:

Author's Perspective: Begin by identifying the author's perspective or argument. What is F. Scott Fitzgerald or Tim O'Brien trying to convey through their storytelling? Is it a commentary on society, war, human nature, or something else?

Character Dialogues and Interactions: Examine how the characters in the selected chapters engage in argumentative dialogues or interactions. Do they hold different viewpoints, and if so, how do they support or challenge each other's arguments?

Narrative Techniques: Explore the narrative techniques used by the author to present arguments. Are there moments of persuasive storytelling, where the author tries to convince the reader of a particular point of view?

Themes and Symbolism: Look for recurring themes or symbolism in the chapters. How do these elements contribute to the overall argument or message of the story?

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos: Consider the use of ethos (credibility), pathos (emotional appeal), and logos (logical reasoning) in the writing. Are there instances where the author employs these rhetorical strategies to strengthen their argument?

Impact on the Reader: Discuss the impact of the argumentative writing on the reader. Did you find yourself persuaded or moved by the author's viewpoint? Why or why not?

Comparative Analysis: If your class is studying both novels, compare the argumentative writing styles and themes between "The Great Gatsby" and "The Things They Carried." Are there notable differences or similarities in how argumentation is presented?