Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Information security Risk management in DATA CENTERS. This is a Risk management class so the majority of the paper must Address the highlighted topic below as it relates to infosec Risk Management (Th
Information security Risk management in DATA CENTERS. This is a Risk management class so the majority of the paper must Address the highlighted topic below as it relates to infosec Risk Management (Threats,Risks,weaknesses,countermeasures,BIA,DRP, etc).Specific Hardware, software,service or systems may be short examples but should only represent a small portion of the total paper.
The research paper must include at least 5 cited works of which 2 must be peer Reviewed.
Highlight in YELLOW the peer- Reviewed works in the References on the Bibilography page.
The Research paper must be at least 5 Double-spaced pages +plus the cover and Bibilography page.
Once the paper is completed, add an Executive Summary to the start of teh paper.
The Executive summary must contain the Hypotheses (see Rubric) and a synopsis of what is contained in the paper.
Research Project Rubric Component Exemplary (3) Adequate (2) Inadequate (1) Project Overview Effectively and insightfully develops a set of testable, supportable and impactful study hypotheses Develops a set of testable and supportable hypotheses Hypotheses are not testable or justifiable Justification for Hypotheses The introduction section provides a cogent overview of conceptual and theoretical issues related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking. The introduction section provides a logical overview of conceptual and theoretical issues related to the study hypotheses. Demonstrates competent critical thinking. Very little support for the conceptual and theoretical relevant to the study hypotheses was provided. Provides little evidence of sound critical thinking. Supporting Evidence Provides clearly appropriate evidence to support positionProvides adequate evidence to support positionProvides little or no evidence to support positionReview of Relevant ResearchSophisticated integration, synthesis, and critique of literature from related fields. Places work within larger context. Provides a meaningful summary of the literature. Shows understanding of relevant literature.Provides little or no relevant scholarshipMaintains Purpose / FocusThe project is well organized and has a tight and cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the document The project has an organizational structure and the focus is clear throughoutThe document lacks focus or contains major drifts in focusMethodology Sample Procedures Measures Data analytic planIdentifies appropriate methodologies and research techniques (e.g., justifies the sample, procedures, and measures). Data analytic plan is suitable to test study hypotheses. Provides appropriate justification for controls. Project is feasibleIdentifies appropriate methodologies and research techniques but some details are missing or vagueThe methodologies described are either not suited or poorly suited to test hypotheses. The methodology is under-developed and/or is not feasible. Grammar, Clarity, and OrganizationThe manuscript is well written and ideas are well developed and explained. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically correct. Uses subheadings appropriately.The manuscript effectively communicates ideas. The writing is grammatically correct, but some sections lack clarity. The manuscript is poorly written and confusing. Ideas are not communicated effectively. References and Citations Properly and explicitly cited. Reference list matches citations.Properly cited. May have a few instances in which proper citations are missing. The manuscript lacks proper citations or includes no citations