Keating v Goldick and Lapp Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc. 1. Define scope of employment. Why is this concept important in principal-agent

Keating v Goldick and Lapp Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.1. Define scope of employment. Why is this concept important in principal-agent relationships? Explain.2. Why was Lapp Roofing found not liable in this case? Explain. If the negligent conduct had occurred when Goldick was driving to a restaurant for a meal, would the decision have been the same?3. Did Lapp Roofing act ethically in denying liability for the negligent conduct of one of its employees?No word minimum / limit. Requires legal research.