Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.

QUESTION

Literature Review Directions You may have one or more articles. Adjust your organization to that number. I want ONE unified review. Do not write a separate response for a 2nd article. You may have

Literature Review Directions

  • You may have one or more articles.  Adjust your organization to that number.  I want ONE unified review.  Do not write a separate response for a 2nd article.  You may have the option to read additional articles for extra consideration, but you then must write MORE.  IE, still a detailed evaluation of each article, NOT a superficial response to more articles.
  • What you write must be about the reading(s).  I do NOT want an essay on the topic that the article is about. I want a response to/evaluation of the reading(s). (I don't want an essay of your opinion with just an occasional reference to the article(s) if they support your point. I want a review of the article(s) and how they prove THEIR point, tied together with a theme.)

In the INTRODUCTION

Find unifying theme for the articles.  What is that "Big Paper" about? Set up the article(s) - What is the topic? Why is it relevant? Why is it important?  Why are we reading THESE articles? 

In the BODY paragraphs:

  1. Identify and Summarize the reading: Title, author, premise/thesis.  What is the thesis?
  2. Choose a key or essential argument, statistic, etc. from the reading and explain it. What are the most important ideas,  theories, or data sets? Are there references to other theories/studies that are important (Dunning-Kruger effect, Hofstader, Gilens and Page...)?
  3. Evaluate the argument.  Strengths? Weaknesses? What would you add? What did author fail to see?    Focus on the big picture,  not minutiae.
  4. Repeat b and c for same article and then subsequent articles repeat a,b,c.  The more depth the better.

In the CONCLUSION:

Evaluate the sum of the arguments.  What is the impact/importance of this data?  Does it MATTER (what are  the implications if true)?  Why/Why not? How does it contribute (or not) to our understanding of the main subject? Connect back to your specific questions and ideas in the intro.  Restate them.  Then "close the circle" and provide answers or insights based on the readings.  

Assignment: 

Required # 1:  (Presents general ideas) Tom NicholsHow America Lost Faith in Expertise and Why That's a Giant Problem

Required #2:

(Example of an expert that we may be ignoring) Jeffrey C. Isaac  

How Hannah Arendt’s classic work on totalitarianism illuminates today’s America

required 3:How a Populist Destroys America.pdf

Online version: How a Populist Destroys America

Part of:  The Battle for the Constitution   The Atlantic

required  4

Chronicle of Higher Education

Truth as Commodity

Show more
  • @
  • 958 orders completed
ANSWER

Tutor has posted answer for $20.00. See answer's preview

$20.00

********** ReviewIn **** ***** ** *** ***** ** **** ** *** **** ** as citizens **** * *** ** *********** ******** *** **** ** *** usually necessarily * *********** thing ****** access to *** *** *********** ******* **** ** not makes ***** ******** **** **** *** specialists ***** **** **** ********* ** a ******* ***** ***** ** **** folks follow **** they ******** to ** **** without *********** if they *** reading a **** ***** ** *** ** **** ***** * ******** that ** into **** ****** **** include: ****** ******* **** ***** ** Expertise *** *** ******** * ***** ******* ** *** ******* *** ****** Arendt’s ******* **** ** *************** *********** ********* ******* ** Jeffery * ***** *** *** ***** articles **** ** ******** *** ***** ***** one ** **** Truth Becomes * ********* ** Daniel * Rodgers *** *** ****** *** ** *** **** *********** ** The Largest-Ever Study of **** News ** ******** *********** ********** point **** “How America Lost ***** ** ********* *** *** ******** * ***** ******* by *** ********** ******* made is **** ** *** talking about *** *** ***** **** sampled ***** bombing ******* **** *** * very **** sample of **** *********** *** ********* *** it is * ****** ***** ** Disney ***** and *********** commented ******* ******* it **** than a ******* ** republicans **** **** ****** ********* **** **** would ** *** it *** **** 013 ** *** ****** **** **** ***** be ********* *** constitutionalists *** **** ****** *** ******* *** ** ******* ** *** **** *** **** ** ******* The *********** ********* that the place ****** ** ****** ** *** *** they ****** **** anything **** about the ***** This first article points out *** ** ********* ****** **** * ******* **** ** lean *** *** ** *** other That ***** ***** ** reading this because democrats **** ** lean **** from warAnother interesting ***** that this ******* ***** ** **** *** ** ******** *** ** * ***** ***** **** ** ********* is * virtue ********* what ** **** ***** ******* *** **** ******* want ** **** ****** ** *** ******* ** *** ****** **** want ** be able to ******** ***** **** *** *** ** told **** they *** ***** ****** **** ** have ***** ******** about things **** if **** ********* **** much ******** ** *** ***** ** ******* that *** article ***** ** **** ****** Google ******** **** **** *** **** and tell ***** ****** **** **** know **** is ***** **** **** ******* **** **** read ** on *** ******** This is ********* that ** ******** a ****** ******* with ****** ***** They ***** **** **** more **** the expert ******* of **** they **** **** online ****** *** **** ** ******* one **** ****** **** *** not be ***** more ******** *** just ********* **** they ******* ******* interesting ***** **** **** ******* ***** ** **** *********** are **** wrong *** *** good **** **** admit ** *** **** won’t admit **** **** *** ***** *** ********* people **** *** **** they *** ** expert ** ********* **** ** **** ******** *** ****** will ****** **** ****** ** ***** the ***** ** *** *** **** *** know **** ******** ******* about people will **** ** ****** you This article ****** *** **** we *** ****** ******* * Google-driven Wikipedia-established failure ** *** ********* between **** *** ******** *********** point **** *** second ******* ** that **** **** ** ********* *** when ************* **** *** ****** start following them ** is **** ** **** ************* **** *** ****** ** the mob ********* This ** when ****** follow *** mob ** ******* **** don't ** **** ******** ** *** ***** **** **** will **** ****** **** ******** **** ******** ** ***** is ****** resentment **** people are **** ****** *********** ** ********** **** ****** ** *** ****** and **** they are for ** against ******* *********** point that this article ***** is that ****** ********* **** *********** ******* connections **** ********** ** ******* ** framework ************ gatherings *** ******** *** ********** something new *** ****** *** whose intrigue *** ************* in *** very truth **** **** **** *** *** extraordinary We *** ****** **** today *********** ***** **** change and ********* ***** **** what's ******** ** are promised that things **** ****** *** **** gets ****** ****** ** *** the ****** and they can feel like **** *** ******* the change An *********** **** **** *** ***** ******** ******* is **** we are in * ********** age ***** ****** opinion is ****** more ** emotion *** ******** ******* ****** will go *** ** their *** to **** *** ******** **** they ******* but they ***** research the opposing **** **** **** the ****** **** they are ***** **** ******* **** ***** ** a conspiracy *** **** the ***** side is ***** *** they ** basing ** ** *** **** feel They *** not **** *** any ****** **** seeing ** ******** *** **** ** *** ***** *** exaggerated ***** that ****** will **** ******* ******* ** ******* their ******* ** *********** ***** **** *** ****** optional ******* ** **** *********** news *** ***** ******* ******* ******* more *********** ***** further **** the ******** ************ and ****** * lot quicker **** precise ******* ***** *** be ******* that *** more *********** ** *** ****** **** ***** ** **** *** ***** **** ****** **** **** to ******* **** they first read *** ** *** **** *** ***** ***** out **** already **** an ******* ** *** ****** **** ******* ****** **** * ***** ***** is **** likely ** go virile than * **** ***** **** news about ******** ********* **** *** ******** ******* claims that ****** ****** ** ***** **** ******* than **** **** **** tend to *** ****** **** ***** ** **** the real **** **** **** ** easier ** *** people to form * ******** ******* ***** something **** will *** ********** ******** ** ****** and **** ****** *** *** **** **** ** ******* ** ***** **** ** ********* ****** **** the **** **** **** **** *** make ** ** people ****** **** what ** ******* That *** put ****** ** ****** ****** need to **** **** ** **** *** **** they are ******* *********** **** **** ** see ** *** author was ******** **** kind of language ** **** *** *** the *********** came *********** *** the information that ** as ********* **** ** *** ********** we **** to ** ******* Every person needs ** **** **** **** **** *** doing ***** **** to **** **** what **** *** ******* ** *** ***** ***** ******** **** ******* *** how ****** will **** ** ****** **** they ******* *** *** look ** the other **** **** **** ******* *** that people *** ******* ***** information *** ********* ** is ****** ** get ****** to ******* ***** *********** ***** *** ***** ******* *** there but if they *** like **** know what **** *** ******* about **** **** get people to follow ********************

Click here to download attached files: Literature Review.edited.docx
or Buy custom answer
LEARN MORE EFFECTIVELY AND GET BETTER GRADES!
Ask a Question