Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Maria is one of two directors and shareholders of a company. David is the other director and shareholder. Maria wants to borrow $100,000 for both the company and for private purposes from a bank. She
Maria is one of two directors and shareholders of a company. David is the other director and shareholder. Maria wants to borrow $100,000 for both the company and for private purposes from a bank. She borrows the money in her own name, but the bank wants a guarantee from the company. She knows David will refuse to do so, so she signs the guarantee ‘Maria, director’ and writes ‘David, director’ in writing that is dissimilar to her own. If Maria fails to meet payments under the loan agreement, can the bank enforce the guarantee against the company?
I need to use IRAC approach for this question , need help in that and this is Australian Law so i require someone who has knowledge of the Australian constituion
- @
- 165 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $20.00. See answer's preview
********** ********** *********************** ***** ** **** **** is **** *** ******** makes *** ******** ** behalf ** *** ***** ********* ******* ********** **** ********* ** ** 2014) Maria *** ** *** ** *** ********* *** also * ************ ***** on behalf ** *** ***** ******* asking him ** ** *** guarantee *** the ****** ***** she ***** ** *** some for ******** *** ***** *** ******** useRuleThe law from which *** **** ** **** ** *** Australian ************ is a *** ***** the cooperate ********* ***** states that *** ***** **** ** *********** *** *** ******* ** those who *** part of *** ******* ** the ****** of ** ************ ******* ******* *** cooperate *** **** ******* 7 ******* 1308 * ** ** **** * **** **** each ******** should have information before ********* ***** ***** ** the organizationApplicationThe *********** *** **** **** ****** ******* the director acts on behalf ** the ***** ******** ** **** ******* ** communicating *** ****** *** ****** *** ends ** signing *** him ***** ** ***** **** ** ***** taking $100000 ***** ** **** for the ******* *** *** ******** use ** ******** ***** corporate criminal ********* et ** 2014)The ***** ***** *** ********* ******** in * ******* ****** be ************ for ******* *** but one ****** not *** ********** ******** with ******** ******** (Burton ******* in this ***** ***** *** ****** three ****** **** **** **** ***** *** ***** **** ** ****** * decision ***** ********* ***** to use **** *** personal *** *** not ***** *** ******** ** ** ****** be *** third *** ** *** fact *** ***** on ****** ** ***** which forgeryConclusionIn ********** *** ******* **** ** ****** in case ***** **** *** *** the **** ** ** because of *** ********* *** act ** ****** ** *** ******* ********* ** ** ********* *** *** end ** ** ****** ** per *** ************ ** ********* ******* of ****** *** ******** without ********** *** communicating **** *** ***** managerHer ****** ***** **** kind ** ***** ** general the ************ shows **** **** ***** and *** ********* **** **** ** suffer and ** ****** *** the ******* they take ** ** ***** the responsibility ** *** ******* to ****** its employees ******* the ************ ** the *** At *** **** **** ensure **** **** *** ****** ********* ****** one ***** * **** so **** **** *** ******* **** *** ***** ****** (Burton ********************* * (2016) ******** *** ********* ******* Solving: ** ******* of ** Incremental Approach ** ***** **** in Legal **************** of ********** ******** ***** Learning Practice13(5) ********* * Miller * ***** Cross F (2014)Business **** Texts and ***** ****** *********************
