Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
QUESTION
McCloskey refers to the arguments as "proofs" and often implies that they can't definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be...
- McCloskey refers to the arguments as “proofs” and often implies that they can’t definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned. What would you say about this in light of Foreman’s comments in his “Approaching the Question of God’s Existence” presentation?
Files:
McCloskeyArticle.pdf
