Need an argumentative essay on A new approach to drug policy: drug law reform act. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.Download file to see previous pages... In the late 1960’s to early 1970

Need an argumentative essay on A new approach to drug policy: drug law reform act. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

In the late 1960’s to early 1970’s, law makers in New York faced a great challenge on drug problems regarding its growing number that they feared to be out of their control as well as command (Lui, 2009).With a number of approximately 559,000 drug users, it is in no doubt that a dilemma in drugs was inevitable during that time and it even increased by up to 31% by 1972. With these large number of felonious acts, it is just normal for the government to take an action on the situation to stop the spreading phenomenon and to eradicate the problem as well, as much as possible. Nelson Rockefeller, the Governor of New York that time, established a separate commission to deal on matters of narcotic drugs. The so-called “Narcotic Addiction and Control Commission of 1967” is assumed to be ineffective and ineffective to solve the predicaments on drug trafficking and drug addiction. There are also financial difficulties that this commission encounters – it is somehow expensive to make the commission to operate. Because of this uncontrolled situation on rugs in New York during that time, the government bona fides to implement a stricter policy to deal with the issue, assuming that it will solve the problem more effectively. Because of the futile results of the first actions made like the Narcotic Addiction and Control Commission and the Methodone Maintenance Program, the government makes itself to believe that the state should have a strict policy – harsh enough for it to be noticed and feared. ...

On the other hand, the state of Michigan, under the former Governor Hugh Carey also implemented a drug policy known as the “650-lifer law” in 1978 (Canfield, 2009). This law utters a condition that if ever a person is condemned in carrying drugs. weighing 650 grams will be facing the ruthless sentence of life imprisonment and even death. These laws are well-known of its ruthless drug chastisement and even recognized by many to be the harshest drug policy ever existed in America. Drug Law Reform Act (DLRA) as a Public Policy Kilpatrick, a PhD defines public policy in his web article entitled Definition of Public Policy and the Law as a “system of laws, regulatory measures, courses of actions, and funding priorities concerning a given topic promulgated by governmental entities or its representatives.” In lay-man’s term, we can describe public policy as anything that the government does that affects the public. With these definitions, it is right to say that the DLRA is a public policy that the government constituted to have a safety measures in dealing with drug offenders and other related issues. Also, an action to reconstruct the brutal provision of sentence and to correct the flaws created by the RDL. In 2004, George Pataki (former Governor of New York) amended the well-known Rockefeller Drug Law and took into effect the Drug Law reform Act. What the DLRA does is the revision of the obligatory minimum sentence from 15 years to 8 years. It also revives the personal discretion of the Judge on matter of drugs and allowed the convicted person to apply for re-sentencing. The law is created primarily to solve the discrepancies of a harsh and ineffective drug law.