Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an argumentative essay on An Analytical Comparison. Needs to be 10 pages. Please no plagiarism.As a result, they present a more thorough macro-historical perspective on revolution than previously
Need an argumentative essay on An Analytical Comparison. Needs to be 10 pages. Please no plagiarism.
As a result, they present a more thorough macro-historical perspective on revolution than previously offered by historians.
The English Civil War is directly related to the ensuing revolution that followed, and though it had a plethora of origins, the character of Charles I must be regarded as one of the main catalysts. It is doubtful that one could have foreseen that the civil war, which began in 1642, would have resulted in the execution of Charles I. Furthermore, it was surprising that Oliver Cromwell, Charles' most notorious opponent, would be one of the men who would sign Charles' death decree. Prior to this incident, a king had never been put to death in England, and Charles' execution was not met with joy. But, in order to get at the root of the war, one must explore both the short and long term causes.
In 1611, James suspended the Parliament, and it did not reconvene for another ten years. James allowed his friends to govern the country, and he heaped titles upon them. This was a cause of great offence to members of Parliament who felt that they had been granted the right to govern the country. In 1621, James summoned Parliament to confer about a proposed union of his son, Charles, to a Spanish princess. Parliament was enraged by the news. If the marriage were to proceed, would the children of this marriage be raised as Catholics Spain was by no means thought of as a friendly ally to England, and many could recall 1588 when the Spanish Armada occurred. Consequently, the marriage never happened, but the soiled relations between the king and Parliament would not be repaired by the time of James' death in 1625.
In 1642, Charles took three hundred soldiers to Parliament to seize his five biggest detractors. But, someone from within the Kings' inner circle had already alerted Parliament that these men would soon be arrested, and they had previously fled to shelter of London where they could easily hide in the city. But, Charles had already revealed his true colors. The members of Parliament were supposed to stand for the people, and yet Charles attempted to arrest five of the members simply because they dared to disagree with him. If Charles was capable of arresting five members of Parliament, then how many others were in danger It was not long before Charles began to realize that relations between himself and Parliament had been severed. Only six days following the attempted arrest of the five members of Parliament, Charles went to Oxford in an effort to raise an army that could regain control of England. A civil war could not be prevented. Monarchial clout had already declined under the rule of James I. What ensued was civil war, and ultimately, revolution. In his book, Lawrence Stone explores these factors and the ways they coincide with other external stimulus.
Lawrence Stone's book begins with theory and then attempts to arrange origins into three classifications: preconditions, precipitants, and triggers. Stone's preconditions have already been outlined. His precipitants encompass the political and religious tensions that had been heating up since 1603. And, his triggers are closely aligned to the Crisis of 1637-1642. The long-term economic and social changes
