Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an argumentative essay on Part II: Compilation of Industry Issues Report (the Computer Industry). Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.As a means of doing such an analysis, it is the hope of
Need an argumentative essay on Part II: Compilation of Industry Issues Report (the Computer Industry). Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.
As a means of doing such an analysis, it is the hope of this author that the reader will come to a more broad and complete understanding of the way that these firms have spread their influence over almost every aspect of the current system and threaten some very fundamental rights that were previously not at the discretion of but a handful of massively powerful multinationals. It should of course be understood that the author is not fundamentally opposed to the existence of multinational firms or even the influence that they can yield over a given system. rather, the proceeding analysis is meant only to elaborate on a few of the negative externalities that have been born from the existence of these entities. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, the issue of free speech and censorship has come to a level of prominence of late due to the means by which the federal government and private entities are seeming to cooperate to a closer and closer degree. This is of course worrisome for those that seek to retain a level of internet privacy as well as fight the seemingly endless battles against censorship of free speech. As a function of this, the reader should be aware of the fact that both Apple and HP, arguable two of the biggest extant tech companies in existence, refused to attend hearings on the Global Network Initiative. a multi-stakeholder conference which was sponsored with the express intent of acquainting its members and guests with fundamental issues regarding privacy, human rights on the internet, and other technical and related areas of ethical concern (Chang, 2009). Although one cannot fault these firms too greatly for not attending due to the fact that they have many different obligations that pull them in a variety of different directions, it is bothersome that both of these firms reasoned that such a conference was of so little importance that they would not expend the time to ensure that at least one representative from their firm was able to gain the necessary perspective that such a meeting would necessarily have offered. The tacit understanding that exists with relation to such an action is of course that the firms place a very low emphasis on the importance of these issues. Such an issue is again cause for concern with relation to the way in which the Apple Corporation has outright banned political cartoons from its wildly popular iPhone platform. This was done on the grounds that these cartoons had the possibility or engendered a level of sacrilege to religious or other entities. As the reader can readily note, the shear exhibition of possibility to offend is in and of itself not sufficient grounds for the firm to seek to repress and/or otherwise censor material. Unfortunately however, the censorship of political cartoons is just the beginning of Apple’s issues relating to the free and fair use of information and or information systems.
