Need an argumentative essay on : Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.that this paper supports that setting aside a juvenil

Need an argumentative essay on : Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

that this paper supports that setting aside a juvenile court system, set completely apart from the adult court, and is necessary in correcting minors.

The negative thing about prosecuting minors under the same roof with adult offenders is that the young people might not stand the adult setting which they would regard as “scary”, “harsh”, or “too strict”, and from this, they might give in to the wrong information or admit to charges even if they were innocent just to escape the uncomfortable situations that the adult court settings might subject them to. This can be better put that in the event that a minor committed a felony unknowingly, they might not stand the pressure, but may be forced to admit to the charges without defending themselves.

The subjection of minors to an adult court process or setting is a breach of common human ethics, and translates to a flaw in the criminal justice system. The reason for this is that in being minors, children are prone to commit crimes which they had no idea that they were illegal, and that is a fact that the prosecution should consider. Weighing a child and an adult using the same scales is unacceptable especially when it comes to administering punishment (Bohm & Walker, 2006). This means that the criminal justice system should come up with means of finding out what led the minor to commit a crime, and from it, the proper correction can be administered. Some felonies are committed out of not knowing, or ignorance, and minors can be excused for that.

The case of 16 year old Mark Walberg should support the above suggestion. This was a clear depiction of a reasonable criminal justice process. Upon his pleading guilty of assaulting the two Vietnamese, he was awarded two years at a correctional facility. He did not however have to endure the entire jail period because in 45 day’s time, it was discovered that young Walberg had realized how wrong he was in committing the act, and had resolved to be a better person.