Need an argumentative essay on Pierre bourdieu. Needs to be 12 pages. Please no plagiarism.Download file to see previous pages... Moreover, he creates a bridge between two dualism in the form of ‘ha

Need an argumentative essay on Pierre bourdieu. Needs to be 12 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Moreover, he creates a bridge between two dualism in the form of ‘habitus’, where its original meaning is ‘ an get hold of system of generative systems impartially accustomed to the exact circumstances in which it is comprised of (Pierre1977, p.95). For Bourdieu, the body is a mnemonic gadget whereby the basis of customs, realistic taxonomies are fixed in a socializing process, the socialized body does not stand opposition to society one of its own. On the contrary, habitus does not determine action rather practice. however, individuals do make decision based on principles outside their control. In his own words representatives categorize themselves, represent themselves to categorization by selecting their tastes, clothes, attributes, foods, drinks, sports which go well together and suitable to their position (Bourdieu, 1990, p.132).In addition, our habitus coincides with our class position and it is taken for granted where there is acceptance of the fundamental conditions of existence (Swartz 1997, P.96) Bourdieu defines a field as a network, or a pattern of purpose relations between positions impartially definite in their subsistence and in the willpowers they inflict upon their inhabitants, negotiators or foundations, by their current and possible condition in capital whose ownership orders way in to the exact profits that are at risk in the field, as well as their purpose relation to further locations (Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992, p.39). Consequently, his concept of field is there to provide a framework for analysis of agent and their positions within a given field. The position of agents has been described as accumulation of economic and cultural capital where people are subordinate or dominant in the fields. This, for that reason, elucidates the belief that Bourdieu does not just deem structures bring about social inequality, instead the agents do. A variety of agents that exist include internal logic and regulatory principles that govern the agenda of the field power, which is the most important and symbolic according to Bourdieu’s theory where he highlights other sociologists stating that geographic location can play a part in the field to that of a poker game where the piles of chips reflects the unequal distribution of capital, which is summarized as a result of previous struggles and orient strategies for the future (Swartz,1997, P.123). In the past researchers have concentrated in three diverse perceptions on social capital based on ideas of Bourdieu. This could not be clarified by economics only as he is famous for discussion of cultural capital in ways people use cultural knowledge to anchor their place in the social ranking. Moreover he explores the ways in which the trappings of middle –class taste and farming is used by communities as cultural implications as they try to identify themselves with those on top of them on the social ranking, and to reveal their disparity.