Need an argumentative essay on Qualitative methods assignment. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.Download file to see previous pages... Findings presented or conceptualised in a way that offer

Need an argumentative essay on Qualitative methods assignment. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Findings presented or conceptualised in a way that offers new insights/alternative ways of thinking

Discussion of limitations of evidence and what remains unknown/unclear or what further information/research is needed

The authors has exhibit a deeper knowledge and understanding on the topic that they are studying with. They were able to mapped out evidences and supported by literatures of previous studies and theories.

The main goal of the study is to have a clear comparison between the content and the quantity competitive and organizational stressors in elite athletes.

The limit of the discussions was clearly stated that the validated statements shall focus on the stress relating to sports, personal and other matters were not considered.

FINDINGS

a) Appraisal Questions

b) Quality indicators (possible features for consideration)

c) Notes on study being appraised

3

How well does the evaluation address its original aims and purpose

Clear statement of study aims and objectives. reasons for any changes in objectives

Findings clearly linked to the purposes of the study - and to the initiative or policy being studied

Summary or conclusions directed towards aims of study

Discussion of limitations of study in meeting aims (e.g. are there limitations because of restricted access to study settings or participants, gaps in the sample coverage, missed or unresolved areas of questioning. incomplete analysis. time constraints)

The aims of the study were consistent and there were no reasons to alter it at the end. Findings were clearly based on the aims of the study and it clearly nailed down the very core purpose of the study.

The concluding statements were clearly cited from the introduction, where aims and purpose...

Furthermore, the strong statements in the results were based from previous studies and related literature, which was the cornerstone in their superb conclusions. Although evidence were not fully utilized and presented, the literatures made it credible.

Credible/clear discussion of how findings have contributed to knowledge and understanding (e.g. of the policy, programme or theory being reviewed). might be applied to new policy developments, practice or theory

The authors has exhibit a deeper knowledge and understanding on the topic that they are studying with. They were able to mapped out evidences and supported by literatures of previous studies and theories.

Discussion of limitations of study in meeting aims (e.g. are there limitations because of restricted access to study settings or participants, gaps in the sample coverage, missed or unresolved areas of questioning. incomplete analysis. time constraints)

The aims of the study were consistent and there were no reasons to alter it at the end. Findings were clearly based on the aims of the study and it clearly nailed down the very core purpose of the study.

The concluding statements were clearly cited from the introduction, where aims and purpose of the study was introduced. Thus, the questions and uncertainties on the preliminaries were clearly answered and re-stated in the conclusions.