Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an argumentative essay on The Issue of Racism and Racial Discrimination. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.While this situation is ideal, there are instances when problems arise because s
Need an argumentative essay on The Issue of Racism and Racial Discrimination. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.
While this situation is ideal, there are instances when problems arise because some social psychological research theories can aggravate racism either by faulty analysis, misinterpretation and bias of various forms. Mainstream View Racism is currently perceived to be in decline in the United States. Since the Civil Rights movements in the 1960s, America has adopted several policies and initiatives that sought to address this issue and discrimination and vigorously pursued the goal of equality. This entails a mainstream view that what the American government has done and is doing is adequate and no further action or improvement is needed on existing policies. However, this mainstream view is currently considered as the new racism. It is characterized by a clear denial of discrimination and cases such as an irritation or anger directed at minorities who ask for equal treatment. (Pennington 2000, p. 124) One can identify this when whites raise the issue of the so-called reverse racism, as they resent the fact that minorities are perceived to receive special treatment. The mainstream view that the racism problem is in decline can attributed to the how the mainstream social scientists are mostly composed of white analysts. According to Feagin (2010), because of this, the social sciences in America, which is responsible for the extremely influential racism theories and concepts, have usually found it difficult to examine the problem from any but a white racial framing. (p.4) Although, admittedly, most of the theories about race and ethnic relations such as those posited by imminent social scientists like Robert Park and Milton Gordon are liberal in their perspectives, the theories still fail to account for a truly minority point of view. What this reflects is that the tools and instruments by which society and the policy networks peruse in their actions and behaviors can often be constrained by a number of variables that contribute to the limited understanding of the issue. When this is added to the complexities of the social environment it brings about an overload, which is usually negotiated through categorization. Categorization McGarty (1999) explained that categorization is selective and over-generalized perception that eventually ends up in erroneous and biased perspectives. (p. 82) As previously cited, many social scientists are dominated by white Americans, highlighting a limited perspective that, unfortunately, is still the single major resource in the study of racial prejudice. The problem is highlighted by the fact that racism has cognitive origins because it is based on stereotypical beliefs and attitudes. Social scientists are not immune to categorization. Most social scientists will agree that it is impossible to assume a purely objective role in the study of racism. Blackwell, Smith and Sorenson (2009), for instance, argued that it is natural to be biased and that humans who think rationally and systematically are prone to make prejudiced judgments. (p. 21) In the study and theoretical development of racism, hypotheses are made, social phenomena have to be observed, conflicting variables have to be assessed and conclusions have to be drafted. Social scientists, as humans, have their own thoughts, biases and predispositions that impact their perceptions, theories and propositions.