Need an argumentative essay on The Tea Party Movement. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.The fact is that Tea Party disrupts the political process and it does not help America move forward. In

Need an argumentative essay on The Tea Party Movement. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.

The fact is that Tea Party disrupts the political process and it does not help America move forward. Instead of contributing to the national government, it thoroughly muddles policymaking to the point of paralysis. It’s reason for existence is redundant, echoing that of the Republican, although in a noisier and more populist manner not unlike the voice of the rabble. A core component of the argument that Tea Party is not a helpful addition to the American politics is the fact that it does not have a single uniform agenda. The leaders and organizers try to rationalize this by saying that such fragmentation and decentralization prevents the party from being co-opted and corrupted from within (Rauch 2010). But, unfortunately, this is not the case. The lack of leadership and unifying principles paved the way for divergent goals and priorities among the various groups that constitute the party. The result is raucous agenda that even confounded the very Tea Party members or those affiliated with the group. Consider, for example, the rally that some of Tea Party members staged amidst the debt limit deadline while the Senate is deadlocked and nowhere near the resolution of the crisis. The group converged on the World War II memorial on the National Mall and did some damage to some facilities before proceeding to stage their antics near the White House. As speaker after speaker spoke in unorganized fashion either on a platform or before television cameras, the different messages were vying for the public’s attention. At one point, someone was talking about the government closing down national park. Then, an attendee interviewed by the members of the media covering the event was calling for civil disobedience, demanding that Obama be removed from office (Cooper 2013). A host of other concerns made their appearances - those that are so disconnected from the very reason why the protest was held in the first place, which was the resolution of the debt limit issue being debated in the Senate. It did not help that personages like Sarah Palin, Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee also joined the fray. One is left to wonder what was the point of the entire exercise. There was a controversial issue and it is perfectly alright for people to make take a stand. But in the case of the Tea Party rally, there was no specific or unified position that could have legitimized the affair in its attempt to influence policymaking. The offshoot was a tremendous waste of everyone’s time. Several other incidents show a degree of toxicity and even irresponsibility. In 2010, the movement through its Conservative Political Action Conference endorsed Ron Paul. When it was announced, however, he was met with jeers and boos as if the members did not choose him themselves during the straw poll. In April, Tea Partiers stormed Fox because they felt that the television station needed to report more about the Benghazi attacks, President Barack Obama’s birth certificate and immigration proposals. It is as if the whole organization is utterly off the rails. Even some quarters in the Republican Party, which is the de facto party of Tea Partiers, tend to distance themselves and express dismay about how the group conducts its affairs. For instance, David Frum, a member of the Bush administration scoffed at Tea Party activities, describing them as a couple of hundred thousand malcontents (Younge 2010). One could call Tea Party or its organizers as opportunists.