Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an research paper on integration of surveillance technology into strategies of state control by public order in the uk. Needs to be 9 pages. Please no plagiarism.
Need an research paper on integration of surveillance technology into strategies of state control by public order in the uk. Needs to be 9 pages. Please no plagiarism. Surveillance technology distinguishes itself from other security by ensuring that the state can control its strategies on the people using remotely managed facilities from anywhere around the world (White, 2007, p. 63). The technology integration offers unmatched parts and labor warranty at no additional cost. The public influences the state in its control strategy to integrate surveillance technology. A public order through mass media is a platform that journalists can create to help to communicate the benefits of adopting surveillance technology. Monitoring employees’ productivity, loss prevention, vandalism, and shoplifting just to mention but a few, are some of the benefits surveillance can achieve. In addition, the state can also use surveillance technology to control and protect the occurrence of crime (Freifeld et al, 2014, p. 343). Therefore, the integration of surveillance technology has more benefits than dangers and this gives a justification in its adoption by the state.
Over the years, there has been enough evidence that most state control agencies rely on mass surveillance technologies to facilitate control of citizen’s behavior. As asserted by Uke and Thool (2014, p. 22) software enable the state to spy on their citizens in order to protect, influence, direct or manage their activities within the measures containable. The use of mass surveillance is at broad reach to the UK government. This is because the government has a variety of technologies to use in tracking the movement of its citizens. All the entire information received goes through scrutiny before organizing it into a massive scale, which spies on every person in the entire country (Omtzigt, 2015, P. 5).
The argument on whether to adopt the use of surveillance in state control in the UK was justified by the public complaints over fraud cases, which become rampant.
