Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an research paper on t.s eliots the wasteland, its richness and cataloguing sequences. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism.
Need an research paper on t.s eliots the wasteland, its richness and cataloguing sequences. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism. The Wasteland does fulfill this 18th-century criterion though it was written much later, allowing it to give room to postmodern thought and language reform. And perhaps that is where the creativity of the poet comes in, the ability to draw from the entirety of the canon and yet portray it with a fresh perspective as one’s own. In turn, this is what the parody has also attempted to do.
The introductory lines of Text One showcase a range of juxtapositions as a literary device. The words ‘dead’ and ‘dull’ give a contrast when reading alongside the positive words such as ‘April’, ‘Spring’, and ‘lilacs’. The syntax is also prominent as we are left with various present participles which are placed at the ends of the first five lines. This gives us a feeling that there is the movement which is taking place and we are part of the progression. The language is to the point while maintaining its paradoxical beginnings. The alliteration is smooth (‘Winter kept us warm’) and the action of the poem keeps us in a place which is somewhere between and within the present and the past. Another literary device used is the poet’s use of sudden sound effects. An example is the monosyllabic verse execution of line 4, and the /s/ and /l/ which dominate from line 8 onwards. The second text seems to keep none of this in mind and goes along the text as a simple conceptual guide, failing to pick up on the points of formalistic techniques. If anything, it inserts colloquial language at every given opportunity.
When comparing both of these texts and attempting to dub one as more ‘literary’ than the other, I find Carter’s systematic analysis a key tool in carrying out such a linguistic analysis. Of course, different levels can be used as done by Bradford but that can be done at a later stage. This may be since Carter gives a checklist to work out at the surface levels whereas Bradford’s style calls for a more layered reading of the .calls for texts.
