Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Option #1: Understanding Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral DevelopmentPlease read the case study and answer the questions that follow. Case study: Public Practice—Nobody Follows the Rule: https://uwaterl
Option #1: Understanding Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development
Please read the case study and answer the questions that follow. Case study: Public Practice—Nobody Follows the Rule: https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-accounting-ethics/resources/ethics-teaching-cases/public-practice-nobody-follows-rule
Every accounting firm has its approach to ethical situations with clients and employees. Dave Gordon, FCA, Senior Partner, is to advise the incumbent auditor on the financial situation at a client. He has been noticing that many of the other partners in his firm are not following the rules with respect to transitioning to a new client.
Evaluate the case study to access the ethical reasoning using Kohlberg’s stages of moral development from Dave Gordon’s point of view. Include in your evaluation:
- What should Dave suggest to his fellow partners in the firm and why?
- How can Dave make a decision using Kohlberg’s stages of moral development?
- Could Dave see the moral justification of others in their decision to alter or not follow the rules?
- Can Dave justify the loss of business as a right decision in view of firm goals?
Requirements:
- Your written paper should be 4-5 pages in length not counting the title and reference pages, which you must include.
- Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings, including professional business language.
- You need to cite at least three sources for this assignment, outside of the textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a great place to find resources.
- Your paper must be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA.
- If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s homepage.
Review the Module 1 Critical Thinking rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.
- @
- 1030 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $25.00. See answer's preview
**** Case StudyNameInstitution Dave Case StudyIntroductionAccording ** *** ********* *********** **** are stipulated ** *** ******* ********* ** ********* ************** ***** ** ******* *** ***** ** accounting **** *** ** inform the incumbent auditor ** *** ***** **** **** **** not ******* *** *********** of ********* ********** *** ***** ********* clients As * ****** ******* in * large accounting **** Dave *** already ********** ** **** **** ** ******* ******* *** ************ membership ** the ******* ********* ** ********* *********** ********** **** *** ****** ******** *** ***** **** *** ********* in *** ************ ******* **** *** come to the ********* ** **** ****** clients **** the ********* ******* ***** to ******* the **** The other ******* ** *** ********** including ***** in *** ******* **** **** ****** ** ****** *** ********* auditor and ******** their workDave’s ************* *********** * ***** ****** **** ** ****** *** ****** ******** ** ****** *** ******** ****** ** require the ********* auditor’s consent before *********** ***** tasks **** the incumbent ****** *** main ****** **** Dave ****** propose *** policy **** requires auditor ******* ** ***** subscription to *** **** ** the ******* Institute ** ********* ** *********** The ***** *** regulation ** the charter *** ***** *** prohibit *** ****** **** ****** ********* tasks without *** auditor’s ******* **** should ******** **** these *********** *** ***** to ********* *** ********* of *** ********** ********** The *** ******** *** ***** **** **** ********* the ********* ** *** ***** ****** ***** ******** ** *** ********** ****** ***** *********** *** **** ******** decisions ** **** **** the financial interest in the ******* **** *** ************* *************** ****** **** recommend *** ****** ** ****** ** ***** ***** *********** ***** ** * **** that **** ** ***** ***** ***** ******* ** members ** *** ******* ***** compromise *** ***** of *** ***** If **** ** ********** ** ** ********* body ******** **** ** ** **** ** ***** ********* Since ** is against *** ************ code ** ******* *** ********* members ***** be ******** by the ********* ** ********* *********** ** **** ****** *** firm ** ********* loses ******* ***** and ***** ***** ** ***** recourseSafeguard ************** ****** also ******* the ****** change ** ********* *** ********** ** his **** His **** *** ********* ** ****** itself ** * stickler for regulation All the ******* **** **** *** **** **** ** their ********** and ***** **** **** **** *** *** ******* ******* * client will *** **** a **** **** **** not ****** *** *** since they are *** ****** to give ** accurate *** fair **** ** *** ********* statements **** are ******** If the client ** *** **** ********** that *** company ** *** ********* *** *********** **** ***** ********* ***** ******** **** the ******** ************ **** has ** ******** **** ********** firms *** more ** auditing firms ****** **** * good reputation ** **** ********** is **** **** *** ******* **** collapse ** **** **** ** *** business A good example ** *** fall ** ****** Andersen ***** *** ********* that *** ******* *** been ********** ** *** Enron ******* (Ronen ***** Dave ****** ********* propose *** policy ****** since the behavior ** some ** the ******* ******** *** ********* ** *** ******* The ******* **** be misleading *** ****** ** ** ********* ** ************** ******** ********** *** ******** Using Kohlberg ********** **** ***** ** ********** by **************** ******** The ******** is ***** on ******** ***** and the ************ ** ******** those rules ** *** first stage **** will be obedience *** ********** ******** (Lind ***** **** **** **** *** ******** based ** *** ******** ********** ** choice ********* ***** ******* of his ******* are *** getting punished for ********* *** ***** ** *** ****** ***** ** ************* and ******** **** *********** **** different ********** ***** ***** people **** **** ********* *********** ** *** *** *** ***** ******* ** his ********** **** ** see *** ***** ** not ********* *** auditor ** *** ***** ****** ***************** ******** **** influence the ******** **** selects Dave **** have ** consider *** *** ******* will judge *** ****** ** *** ***** ***** ** the **** interpersonal ************ an ********** ****** ** ****** ***** ** *** ******** ** *** ********* Dave **** **** to ****** * ******** that ******* **** ******** morally *** ** **** **** **** ******** ** **** **** ** **** ** *** ******** ** ***** members ** his ********** *** ******* in *** profession ******* ** the ***** tasks *** *** no issue ******* *** ******* ** ***** *** **** ** ***** customers **** **** *** ******* ** ****** *** regulations as immoral *** fourth ***** ******** *** *********** of ****** ***** **** **** **** to inform *** incumbent ******* ** ******** *** ****** *** Dave **** *********** the ****** order ** ** fails ** follow *** **** required by his ************** **** ******* have ** **** the ******** ****** post-conventional ******** *** choices **** ** based ** *** principles and ******** moral ********* *** ***** stage is *** ****** ******** *********** ** ***** ** ********** ******** *** ******** based ** *** ****** ** ****** (Eisenberg Reykowski ***** ***** ***** At **** ***** **** has ** ***** *** ******* ** his ******** ** ****** *** decision on failing ** **** extra **** **** ****** *** firm ********** ******* *** loss ** ******** On *** ***** **** his ******** ********* the ********* ** his ***** work ** *********** potential conflicts of ******** *** decision will **** the investors **** *** the ***** ******* ** ******** and fair view of the ******* ** **** good ******* ** the report provides ** incorrect view of *** ******* **** ********* will ** misled in ***** judgments *** **** losing **** ***** *** ***** stage of *** ******** ***** ** **** ** *** ********* principles * person makes decisions ***** ** ***** moral ********** ***** *** **** ********** *** *** **** has a ***** code that ********** him ** **** *** right choice ** should propose the ****** ** ****** since ** ** ** accordance ** *** ********* notwithstanding *** ******** opinions **** *** colleaguesMoral ***************** can *** *** ***** ************* of ****** ** *** following *** ***** ** ** ******* ************ ****** ***** ** individualism *** exchange ** **** ***** **** ******* that ***** people have a different ********* ** right *** ***** ****** 2015) ********* ** the second ***** Dave **** ***** **** *** others are entitled to their ***** ************* ** *** ********* the ************ ******** *** justify *** ********* loss ******* Kohlberg’s fifth ***** **** ***** ** the ****** ******** and ********** ****** Dave **** have ** ****** **** *** **** exist *** *** **** ** *** larger ******* *** ******* ****** *** ** the opinion ** *** ******* is ********** due to *** ********* ** the extra ***** ********** ** the ********** **** ********* that rely on *** **** will **** their money ** *** ********* ******* if the information ******** ** a *********** accountant ** ********** **** will ********* have ** overlook *** **** to the ******* ** ** ** ***** ******** to *** ********* **** *** ******* ******************* ****** propose **** *** ******* changes *** policy ** ********* *** ********* ** ********** **** The ******** might **** ** * **** ** the ******* but the ******* **** gain ******* *** ******** ** the ******** Stages **** ****** **** *** ******** ***** ** *** ***** principles In ******* *** ******** made ** Dave ******* the ********* of the accounting profession ReferencesEisenberg * Reykowski J ***** ***** * ****** *** *********** ** ********* values ** Social *** ***** ****** *** 105-122) ************** D ****** *** evolution ** ******** *** handbook ** ************ psychology 747-771Lind * ****** *** ****** ** Moral-Cognitive Development A ******************* ********** ** ***** ********* *** ****** ********* *** 25-48) ************** * ****** ********** ******* ********* ********* ********* *** **** ********** ** ********** *** ********** (pp ****** Springer *** **** ********
