Paper need to be atleast 2500 words with a mimimum of 5 sources. Explain and critique Professor Berman’s assertion that it is important to adopt the legal philosophy of integrative jurisprudence in

*************** ************** POLITICS MORALITY AND **************** ********** ************** *************** Name  AbstractHarold J ****** is one ** *** ******** **** remarkable *** ************** ********** ** *** American ***** ********* ** the twentieth ******* *********** his *********** ****** this ******* ******** on *** ***** philosophy ** integrative ************* and demonstrates *** ********* of his ******** ******* ****** an ****** ** ************* *** *********** ** ************* *** interrelationship ** *** *** religion as well ** its *********** ** ******** ************ ***** ****** ** *** ****** States He *** done **** ***** ********** ******** ******* **** ****** ***** *** ******* with *** **** ** other ********** articles *********** to Professor ********** essay Toward ** *********** ************** Politics Morality *** ******* thus becoming * **** admired *** ********* ******* ** * ****** ******************************* ************* is a ********** ******* to the *** that ****** to **** *** three classical ******* ***** *** ***** ********** *********** ****** *** the ********** *********** ***** ********* schools ** ****************** ********** ****** ****** *** ***** *********** *** ********* ****** ** *** as a ******** **** of **** *** ********* ******** ** ***** ***** this type of *** ** ****** ** a set ** ***** established ** *** state ** ******** ** ***** in ********** ** *** *** *********** self-contained character ************ different in ****** **** ******** *** ******* Legal *********** such ** *** ******** ***** ******** define ******** *** ** ******** ***** stating **** ***** ** no ******** ******* ******** and law and ****** *** the ******* ****** *** ********* *** law **** ******* ***** *** ** a society ****** be **** **** ** *** ******* ** command of *** ********* ** make ********* *** ******************** theory ****** on *** ******** ****** *** ***** *********** *** ********* ****** of *** ** a ******** *** ******* form ** ***** ***** *** ******** which *** based ** ***** principles ******** from reason *** ********** *********** **** ****** ******** *** by ********* ******* ***** and ********* ********* as parts ** *** law ******* **** *** ** ***** **** *** facilitate ********* ** ******** ****** ******** ***** ** ****** ** the supreme ****** who ********* the law should **** ** **** in **** **** ******** * ******** within the **** *** ***** people’s convictions *** ** **************** ****** ** law ****** *** ***** *********** and ********* nature of law as * system **** ******* ************ *** ************ ********** ************** spirit ** * ******* *** or community purely ***** ** *** ***** *********** ******* **** ** ******** or ************* ******* are *********** as **** ** *** ******** ******* *** behaviors ** * ********* ** people ************ **** *** law ** ***** of **** ***** *** ***** principles However ******** to *** *********** **** *** **** ************ ** ********* *** instead of enacted law and ******** ** *********** **** * ******** ** be **** apprehensive ** ******** ***** ********** **** **** * ***** ********** ** *** character and traditions ** * ******** community ** ****** instead ** global ***** *********************** *** primacyThe **** *********** ****** *** *** ******** ******* *** ***** *********** schools ** the confident statements ** fact and belief ****** ** **** ** *** three ** its *** ******* ****** *** eighteenth *** ********** ******* ***** *** a ******** belief **** God *** the author of *** law *********** naturalists and ************ theories **** three ******** ********** ** *** law We ****** more ***** ** ******* **** it *** first expressed adversely ** *** ********** *** ********** ********* ** *** **** period legal ********** ** *** west was ********* ***** ** and separated **** ******** **** *** ** ***** three ********* ******* combined ** *********** Jurisprudence ******** with *** another *** primacy ** * ****** of detaching only *** ******** ********* ********** ****** ** **** **** *** is ******* *** ***** ******* *** ***** ******* **** *** ******** from *** **** divine ******* *** **** ** *** ***** **** ** ********* in theoretical ***************** Jurisprudence *** ***** competitive ********** ** *** *** can only ** ********** ** ************ * **** ***** definition ** *** law **** ************ each of *** ***** ************** *********** ***** *** Politics ******** *** history ***** than **** ** individually adopted ** each ** *** ******* In ******** we ***** ****** * **** **** the ***************** ********* ******* **** as Aquinas Grotius ***** *** ********** *** ********* ***** natural-law theories *** **** without ***** ******** ** their state ** ***** diverse ********** as *********** ********* *** ************ the ***** ******* ** being *********** ************ *** the ********** they ******* **** The ******* ******** ** be **** **** God subsequently *** ** ***** ***** being ****** *** ********** ** their ****** and minds and ** addition ******* ******** ****** **** ****** ** create *** **** ******* the *** They were *********** able ** ******* ********* *** ******* ***** *** three ******* ** human ********** *********** morally *** ************ through a ****** ***** that ** **************** *** inconsistency **** *** ******** *********** ** lawChristians ********* ******* ********* ******** about many ****** but **** **** *** commonly ***** ** the ******** ********* acknowledgment that ***** ** Lord which *** several ******** ** ********* ****** ** an individual ***** ** ** * commitment ** **** *** but ** * ************ ***** it ** an ************** **** Jesus ** ********* over ******* ******* there still ** * ***** ************ among ********** worldwide ** ******* ** its ************* ** *** ************ between Christianity *** LawWhat **** religion **** ** relation to our thinking ***** ***** ethics and ***** ********* The **** ***** *** ******* ****** ***** **** likely be **** ***** With *** ************** ** the **** significant ********* of Thomas ******* as **** ** a *** ***** ******** *** ******** of time and ********* ** ******* ********* of ***** ****** *** *** ***** ********** *** ********* ** its *** without ************* ** *** ***** religious ********** ** ******* to ******* of *** ******* *** *** ***** **** This article ** ***** ** allow to be perceived that ******** has * very *** **** in contributing to legal ethics as **** as ** *** way we ******** ******** of *** *** plan *** ********* ** ***** ****** and ***** ******** ** ************ without ******* ******* analysis *** ********* ** religion Positivism *** *** ******** *********** of lawIn ************ **** *** laws **** **** created during *** **** ****** ** Nazi ******* some being morally ****** **** ******** **** ** *** **** **** ************* *** **** ** ******** and **** **** ******* ******* ** spite ** **** ********* ** ********** ***** **** **** ****************** **** **** of ********** *** ** nevertheless ******** ******** ** ***** who ****** ** allegiance ** ******* positivism ************ *** considering any ******* of * ******* law binding ** *** ***** * well-known lecturer in **** ****** ******* Holmes *********** who *** **** a ***** ** *** ******* ***** ** ************* ******* to find * *** ** reducing *** entire ********* of *** *********** of *** law ** a ****** ********** ** **** *** ****** will do ** subsequently an ********** may ** through ********* *** ** the ********** of a ********** mode ** conduct ***** ** ** utmost ********** This ***** it is ********* **** ** * *** does not ****** ******* things ** **** ** *** through suffering in ******* **** by *** ******** ***** out ** *** ****** **** existing *** operating **** ****** *** law ****** actually ***** *** *** justify ****** ******* **** **** ** written ** the law **** ** ****** This leaves *** citizens ** * ******* ******* any ***** ** ******* ********** *** ************ ** * *** *** the **** ***** they *** ** is ******* *** *** ***** ** no ****** ***** ** ****** ************* a clearly ******* and ********** ********** version ** this ** ********* ** *** ******** *********** of *** is **** *** ***** to give orders **** decisions and ******* obedience comes from the ******** *** are people ** ******** ** * country ******* it ** ********* ** note that **** ***** ****** a small ****** of ****** *** represent **** than half ** *** whole ********** **** no ***** for *** ****** other than ***** ****** *** majority ** ************ ** *** ******** ***** to give **** **** **** * ******** ** *** *** morality ** ******* ** ** ****** ** *** ********** ********* ** *** ***** ** ***** among *** **************** *** most ******** and ******** thing is *** *** ****** ** ******* to **** the moral ***** in terms ** ******* fairness to ***** law *** ** *** **** **** ******* **** moral ***** * *** cannot be a just or ********** *** *** existence and ********** ** a society are not ******** ** ****** *** ******* ** * *** **** ** ***** on personal ******** tastes ** ******** **** *** courts supporting **** subjective ********** ***** ** *** ******* trendA powerful and *********** ********* *********** to a great extent of ****** ******* ********** is **** man ********** ******* ******* **** ****** ****** ***** ** ******** ******** ** is * subject ** ********************* ** "self-definition" **** ********* and ********** ******* ********** ********* *** ** ************ ********* ** a ******** ***** ** ************ civil ************* ** ** *********** ** basic ********* ** the majority judgment **** ** ** *** **** US ******* ***** *********** ********** v CaseyAt the ***** ** ***** **** ****** society ** *** right ** define one's *** **** *** ********* ** existence ** ******* *** ******* ** life of *** ******** *** ** *** ******* ** ***** lifewhich ***** **** *** ***** ********** ***** *** ******** ** addition to man ******** upon *** look and ******** ** ******* ***** are no ******** ********* ** ****** ** ******* ****** using information *** ***** he learns **** **** ** well ** the ********* ** **** *** the ******* ** ********* *** *** **** and ********* ** ********* As ** ***** to *** ** *** ******** sayings of ****** ******* ****** **** *** **** **** ** *** *** ***** ** *** ** *** **** ** the ******** ** ****** also **** that majority **** has ******* **** made ******** ****** **** ******** ** the **** of *** This ******* raises the ******** *** we ****** *** **** due ****** *** ******** ****** *** ******** claims *** ******* ********* ** to ******** ****** having their *** ******** laws and ** the same **** apply to a ******** ** **** ** is quite *********** *** ** ** *** to **** * position *** ** *** definitely ******** ** **** every ********* *** universal concept ** ***** ******** and ******* ** ******** *** **** significant process ** mortification *** ******************* ** *** *** ** clearly ********* ** *** ********* ** *** ***** of a given *** of ***** ** the **** ** **** law ** ******** ******* * sense of ******* ***** on * given *** ** ***** * ****** lawyer ** judge ****** be * good juristNatural *** and *** ******** *********** ** ********** more besides *** **** *********** ** ********** ** *** ability ** *** **** a particular perspective **** the ***** *** ******* of the *** are ******** from **** man ** in ******** ** * man *********** ****** ******* ** ********** of *** ********** ******* *** ****** of rightness *** ********* ** *** *** **** **** of ******* ** *** law ***** ** **** to the very ******* **** ******* ** *** **** the ********* and occurring wisdom ** *** **** ***** *** ****** ****** *** *** * Roman ********* ****** and ****** taught **** *** rule ** *** ** to ** absorbed **** *** inner ****** ** *** ** addition ** ****** Aquinas **** ****** **** ***** *** ****** ** ******* ******* has the ******** *********** ********* ** *** due ** *** **** **** ** ** established by *** *** ** ****** ******* ** ** * certain ********* ** ********* or ***** * ********* meaning from *** ******* *** **** ** that ********** ***** ** ** ******** ** * ********** ** *** ****** than law ********** ********* philosophers *** ******** *** adopt and ******* natural *** *** ** in action and observe *** ******* ** **** the ***** *** ******** ****** ******* ***** general ******* ** ******* ** ******* **** ** ******* law ** ** *** ******* *********** ** *** ** **** believe **** *** ************** to ******** things or ******* ** infringed *** ****** ** ****** ***** *** ***** **** ***** **** ******** ** *** **** of their nature but man frequently and ***** ******** ************* ******** *** ***** rules ***** constitute the *** of *** specifically human *************** thinkers such ** the ***** ** ******* *** John ***** **** * ********** belief *** *** of the opinion **** ******* *** ** ** divine ****** The subsequent ********** **** laws ** ****** *** of ********** *** ** *** Declaration of ************ ** ******** **** **** **** ** *********** *** of beliefs ** contrast this theological ********* ** *** quite ********* for ** ************* thinkers **** ** ***** Aristotle *** ****** ** **** ** ****** ******* ************ **** ** Kant *** HegelContradictions of natural ****** *** ******* ***** *** and ******* ******* bring ** ** *** ********** that **** ****** created *** implemented by *** ******* what ** **** **** *** ****** and ** the **** **** **** * proposition **** ****** be ******* *** **** bring ** ** *** conclusion **** *** ***** ***** *** *** biblical perspective of law ***** ** ** incorporated **** *** existing law ** ***** ** ****** ** *********** ************************** jurisprudence *********** ** ************ ***** issues in the ****** ********* ***** **** schools ** ************* **** **** ***** in advancement ****** in different ******* ** *********** ****** ** *********** ** ** specific those ** *** ****** ****** have ******* ***** * high ******** ***** ** ************* When ** **** ** * ********** ********* ** ******** **** of pole ** ********** jurisprudence *************** ******** ***** ******** ** **** as **** ********** ** the Critical ***** ******* ******** **** **** ***** ***** ** * *** that attempts to ******* *** ******* the ********* ******** of ***** officials *** ** *** **** **** **** the ***** ** origin of **** ******** ** economic ********* *** ***** ********* factors *********** theory *** ******** in ********* ******* Some Roman ******** theorists ** ************* ***** have *********** ** * ******** and ********* organized manner a set ** ***** ********** ** *** ******** ** ***** it ** *** *** ******* ** *** ******** ** ***** ***** for *** ******* ** examining interpreting and ******** **** ***** *********** have found **** ********* *** *** ******* and deciding in ***** *********** of ********** *** *********** ******** ***** ****** have ****** ** *** quality ** **** *** ***** sufficient ** **** ** dutiful ** ******* ********** ******** ** * ************ ** *** **** ****** ** ***** rules *** the purpose ** ****** and interpreting themLikewise *** historical school *** **** ********* ******** ***** * ****** ** *** ********** **** ***** special ********** ** value ** *** precise historical ********** ** *** ******** ***** ******* ***** ****** have ****** ***** *** sociological ***** ** *** association ** *** ** ****** ** ***** ********* and ** other ****** *** ******** ********************* and *************** J ****** in *** essayToward ** Integrative Jurisprudence: ******** Morality History(July **** ********** *** ******* ** ***** * *** 779:Woodruff Professor of Law ***** *** School; **** ********* ** *** ******** ******* *** ****** ** 1938 ********* ******** ** **** LLB **** **** ********** **** ***** ** * ******** ** *** ******* address ********* ** *** annual ******* ** *** ******** ******* of Christian ****** ** Boston ************* ******* ** ***** Hall *********** *** *** Theory ***** ******* J **** *** ****** ******* *** Criminal ****** *** ******* ****** General ****** ** law ***** State ** ******* trans 1945)J Stone *** ******** *** ******** ** *** ****** ******* *********** ************** The ********** *** method ** Law ****** **** ** 1974)Chambers ******** ***** ****** *********** An Analysis" ****** Undergraduate ****** ****** ***** ********* Oliver Wendell ******* *** *** *** ***** **** ** * ****** ***** * ********* ******* ****** Justice ****** ******* *** *** *** ******* ***** *** ***** ********* ********* 10 **** ********** Aquinas:Summa ************** * 90 * **

Click here to download attached files: Assignment Law - Answer.docx