Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Philosophical Anthropology
Define philosophical anthropology and compare the psychological and theological understandings of philosophical anthropology. Identify several distinct contributions offered by psychology that are absent (not offered in detail) from Christian theology. Identify several distinct contributions offered by Christian theology that are absent (or not offered in detail) from psychology. Are psychological and theological perspectives on philosophical anthropology ultimately opposed to and irreconcilable with each other, or can they be reconciled? Defend your answer.
Has to have 3 references and 500 words.
- @
- 25 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $15.00. See answer's preview
************* ************************* ************ ** * discipline ****** philosophy which ***** ** ***** *** ********* ********* investigations ** ***** nature ** an ****** ** ********** human ****** ** **** creatures of ***** *** environment *** ******** ** ***** *** ****** ** ******** **** *** ******* ** *** ***** nature *** *** ***** condition to ****** questions ** ***** nature ** *** ** the ******* humanistic ********** *** ********** ******* ***** * ******** ********** it is ***** some ************ *** *********** ******* the ************* *** Christian *********** ************* ** ************* **************** understanding reveals that ***** actions *** the ******* ** the inner ********* ******* the difference ****** ** describing what ***** ***** ********* *** *** *** they *** ** ******* ***** theology ***** a **** approach psychology ******* ** anti-god ******** ********** 2015) ********** looks ** ****** than *** soul ** ** ********** for answers It ***** ******* *** spirit ****** our ****** the **** Spirit of *** and *** ******* ******* ** ***** Christian ******** ****** ** to ******* answers *** describe the ***** ********* ** * **************** ** *** ********** ***** of *** human **** *** its functions more ************ ***** ********* behavior ** * ******* context focuses **** on *** *********** *** *** ********** approaches ** ********* **** life ******** ******** to ************* ************ ** *** ***** **** ********* ******** ********** ******* ** the ****** while ****** use ** *** ******** ********* and ********* found ** *** Old *** *** Testaments ** ******* ******* to ************* ********* *********** ***** ********* to ******** environment ** *** *** *********** factor ** *** we are and what ** do ****** ************** *** our ******* ** ******* ********** ** ***** ** ************* ************* ************ ******* ********** *** ******** According ** ******** ******** ********** *** * product ** how **** ********** ***** ** ***** ** *** *********** *** ****** not ***** others *** *** problem ********* ** ************* *** ** us *** the ******** ** the environment ** ***** ** **** (Entwistle ***** ********* ** are *** accountable or responsible *** *** *************** ************* ******* ** ************* ******* and ******** ************ ** *** ************* ************ ** ********** is *** ******* of ********* Soul *** understood ** *** **** of ***** ****** **** makes **** ****** and ********* possible *********** 2004) Any person has *** ********** ** think ****** *** come ** **** ** objective ******** ** ********** **** ********** ********* ** **** ** *** ******* the ***** **** *** **** are the ***** to seek ******* ** philosophical ************ unifying *** ***** ****** *** *** environment requires human mind ***** ******* an ********* roleThe ****** ************ ** *** ******* ** *********** **** ** *** theory ** ************** Freud conceived ************* ********* ** * ******** ** **** and ************* ***** *** ******** ****** in *** ********* ******** ******** ***** *** ***** ** mind plays * *********** **** ** ************* ************ ***** some ******* ******* ***** intelligence ** provide * ****** ******** Therefore consciousness of *** **** enable *********** ** ** ***** ** ********** ***** ************ **** **** *** **** to ********** *** what is ****** ***** limit hence ********* *** understanding ******* *** ***** nature *** *** environmentDistinct ************* ******* by Christian TheologyThe existence of ******* ** *** ******** ************ ** ************* ************ **** Christian ******** ** ******* by ********** over the ********* ** spirits ********* ******** is the ******* ** the ******* **** Spirit *** ** ******** ******* *** demonic spirits Where ******* **** ****** ** the most powerful *** ** **** ** convert an ********** or ******* the ***** ********* ** the ****** ***** ****** is *** *** ******** conscious which ** *** **** ** determine good ***** or **** actions ** be ********************* ** *********** ******* in *** ************* ************ is * ******** ************ **** *** Scheler the ****** *************** ** ******* *** human ***** ** a ********* ******** *** *** ** *********** ********* ** ********* ** ************* ******** ***** He ********* * ****** ** * ********** structure **** ** *** **** soul *** ****** ** this **** **** * spiritual emotion ** *********** *** of *** ********** ** ******** ** other ****** *** *** out ** psychological emotionsConclusionPsychological and *********** ************ ** philosophical anthropology ********** opposed ** and irreconcilable **** **** ***** The ***** ******** by *** two ************ ************* *** theological *** total ********* **** each other ********** 2015) They **** *** unifying factor ** ********* Even ****** **** ********** *** ************* **** still believe **** two cannot ** ********** ** ******* ********* theologies *** psychologists ******* in **** other ************ ** party is ***** ** ****** *** ****** ** *********** ***** ** others ********** 2015)ReferencesCrapanzano V ****** *********** horizons: An ***** ** literary-philosophical anthropology ********** ** ******* pressEntwistle * ****** *********** ********** ** ********** *** ************ ***** ******* **** ed) ******* **** and ***** ***************** P ****** *** ******* ** ******** ** ******* ********** ************* ************ ** ****** * ***** *** Siebert ****** J ********* ********* ** *** Frankfurt ****** ** ************ theology: critical ****** *** the future ** religion pp42–66Nichols * ***** ***** S * (2003) ************ ** ********** ******* ** pretence ************** and understanding ***** ***** Clarendon ************ ********** *******
