PHILOSOPHY DIALOGUE PROJECT

* SInce there's no philosophy subject, therefore, I posted into english\

QUESTIONS Choose one of the following questions for your project.

1. Kant argues for the need to develop a pure moral philosophy, one determined by rationality rather than impulse. Hume argues that it is from our sentiments that our moral judgments are made—that we are motivated by our feelings. Compare the two arguments: what is the strength of each? What is the weakness of each? What challenges do each present for the other’s arguments?

2. Descartes uses skepticism to strip away all of his unfounded beliefs in order to retain only that which cannot be doubted. Describe the two possible scenarios he presents that convince him that his beliefs are safe from doubt and what sorts of beliefs each thought experiment helps to undermine. Then, what idea does he ultimately argue cannot be doubted? How does this use of radical doubt contribute to Descartes’ larger goal, to develop a set of beliefs that are trustworthy?

Requirements:

1. One of the strengths of this form is that it allows the author to explore an idea or argument from multiple points of view, and sometimes none of those views are his/her own.

2. The assignment is to make use of this form by writing a dialogue between two or three characters. Later in the semester, you will be given a list of topics from which you'll choose one for your dialogue.

3. Length requirement: the dialogue must be no less than 1200 words and no more than 1500 words.

* I require a dialogue not essay, please dont a essay.