Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Physician Assisted Death: a Deontological Approach
Is a physician-assisted suicide justified?The practice of mercy-killing can be judged as either humane or inhumane depending on one’s moral obligations and the consequential considerations. The controversy about the idea of death with dignity has aroused interest among scholars. This has called for the application of the existing ethical theories to justify any of the possible positions. This paper applies the deontological moral theory to examine the dilemma in question which was introduced in week one’s assignment. The deontological theory will reaffirm the week one previous position. Since the theory is majorly based on moral actions, it is likely that the end stand will disapprove PAD. The utilitarianism theory will be opposed to this because it puts into account the consequences of an act.
- @
- 126 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $20.00. See answer's preview
************ ** * ****************** ******* ********** *** ******** of ************* can ** judged ** ****** ****** ** ******** depending ** ******* moral obligations *** the consequential ************** The *********** ***** the **** of ***** **** ******* *** ******* ******** ***** ******** This has called *** the *********** of *** existing ******* ******** ** ******* *** ** *** ******** ********* **** paper ******* the ************* ***** ****** ** ******* *** ******* ** ******** ***** was introduced ** **** one’s assignment *** deontological theory **** reaffirm the **** *** ******** ******** ***** *** theory ** ******* ***** ** moral actions it ** ****** **** the *** ***** **** ********** *** *** ************** ****** **** ** opposed to **** ******* ** puts into ******* *** consequences ** ** ********* *********** *** deontological ****** ** * ******* ***** ******** ********* by * ********** *********** Immanuel **** **** ****** ** ******* ** *** ********** **** any decision **** an aim majorly ******* * predetermined maxim ** ***** **** ***** *** ********* ** *** *** **** implies that *** ********** *** *** ************ ** *** ******* ‘A ***** ********* a ********** policy or ** ** ** *** *** ** ******* policy *** ********* ********** the ********** ********* ** decision ** which ** or *** **** ********* ***** p ******* **** ******* **** ******** ** * *** of ******* rules ***** *** universal *** applicable ** *** ***** ****** ****** *** rational ****** *** therefore the decisions **** **** should ** ****** ** reasoning Kant supposes **** we ** not *** ************* *** rather ** ****** (Thong ***** *** ***** ********* ** **** ********** ********* should ** ****** ** **** **** *** **** ******* will’ ** **** context refers to ****** ***** *** ‘good ******* **************** or ‘unconditionally ******* ************* ***** ******* *** ********* ***** of the ******** ** *** *********** what it ******** Goodness ** *** a ******* ** *** success of *** act *** ****** *** morality ** *** *** Ideally ** *** ******* ** appreciate ****** *** their good deeds even if *** consequences are negative The good **** ** motivated by **** ** *** have * **** ** *** morally ***** *** ******* ** **** to but because ** ** a ***** duty and ** *** indebted ** fulfilling itApplication *** ************* ******* ****** ** fully ******* to ********** at ********* circumstances ******* is ******* a ***** **** Can ** ** justified? In the contemporary ****** there are ** ***** **** so far ***** *** *** ** justify ******* Similarly both *** religious and cultural ***** are ******* ** **** ******** On the ******* ** ******** *** ********* ****** highly condemn **** *** ***** argument is ****** ** by ******* **** ***** ******** **** as *** ***** Culturally *** ********** ******* ***** **** *** the ********* ** **** rule would attract ***** ************ *** only ** *********** but **** ** ***** respective ***** ************ *** ** ****** *********** ** the ****** ******** ** *** ******* ********* (Collste ***** *** medical ************* barred **** taking **** ** ********** **** ** *** ******** ** the patient Therefore **** disqualifies the ******** good **** ** *** *** making ** ******* For ** act ** ** ********** moral ** ****** ** **** ****** and ****** ** done **** *** ***** ********* ******** ********** ** a ********* **** *** ********* moral **** As ******* ********* ** ** *** duty ** *** morally ************ ** ******* and therefore not ******* *********** *********** *** consequences ** PAD **** ******** *** tend ** ******* *** *** ************ **** does *** ***** **** **** He ****** **** *** ******** ******** to **** ****** justify *** ***** ************* 2000) ******* is *** **** ** PAD rational? *** man has no ***** ** ********* ** take his **** ****** **** ****** may ***** **** **** **** freedom over self Kant ********** **** ********** euthanasia ** ** *** ** ***** ******* ** *** rid ** ******* ** *** **** *** freedom ** **** ***** is less ***** ** ***** ******* life ** ********* **** This is *** **** ******** ***** one can ****** ******* **** Kant ******** that ***** **** is ****** ******** ******* **** ********* a ********** **** *********** ********** ***** According to the ***** ******** *** ** and ******* *** *** should not ** ******************* *** ******* of personal ************ ** central *** ****** be ********** ***** ****** ********* ** **** ****** it ** not **** *** ***** ** impose judgments ** *********** ***** who argue ******* *** ************* ******** ** ethical dilemmas **** their ******** ** the ************ ** their acts **** ************ on ********** *** ******** results (O’Neill 2003) **** ******* **** *** theory *** **** ******** *********** acts ** ******** **** ****** *** ** ********** ****** *** ** its *********** ** ********** ******** ********* *** ******** It does *** ******* ******** ******* ** ******* ** disqualifying *** role of ********* ********** ** ******* with ***** ******** ******* **** circumstances *********** the application ** *** *** justification ** PAD should ** ********** ** ***** of ******* ********* *** poor ******* ***** *** ****** *** *** *** euthanasia ** **** ******** ** ***** ****** ********** ** **** as to ***** overburdening ** ***** ******** ** they *** **** **** this **** ****** **** from ******** their ***** **** calls *** the **** of the ******* ** ****** *** *** ********* ***** ** accommodate **** ***** ******** *** *** never ********** *** ************ ******** ** ******** illnesses unless **** **** **** ******* the **** ******** health ******** ****** ********** *** financial *********** ** the **** **** can be a tough race ******** normally *** for death ** ****** these tortures ** this **** ********* ***** **** **** ** ***** to ** ********************** Judgment ** ******* matters ** ******* variable ** *** *********** *** to ****** ********* ********** *** ******* ********** can ** attributed ** ******* ****** *********** ********* intellectual ********** *** ********** life experiences ******* ******** *** *** adequate approaches ** ********** ******* ****** ******* **** form a ***** *** * guideline ** ****** more ******** *** ******** ********* ********* * **** ******** decision *** ** achieved ** * blend ** ******* ***** theories *** reasoning **** ******** ******** can be ****** ** ******** to ********* *********** *** seeking ****** participation ReferencesCollste * ****** ******* *** ************ ****** *********** ***** ************** O ****** * ********** ******* of Kanti's ****** * Regan **** ******* ** **** *** ***** pp ******************* * (2000) ****** ********* *** *** Metaphysics ** ****** * **** brief ********* ******* of ******** * *** ** pp ******** * & *** C-S ****** ******* ** ******* Decision-Making Journal ** ********** Information ****** ***** *******
