Please assist in creating pp presentation with notes for me to complete voiceover. The directions for the final presentation are posted in the "Final Presentation Dropbox." For quick reference here th

Please assist in creating pp presentation with notes for me to complete voiceover.

The directions for the final presentation are posted in the "Final Presentation Dropbox." For quick reference here they are:

• The student will present on the case they wrote about in the first part of the course, including an overview of relevant assessment data necessary for problem-solving like medical indications, patient preferences, QL and contextual features.  The case is to be presented in PowerPoint and can  be presented either by voice-over or recorded video.  As you prepare your virtual presentation, draw on some lessons from TED-style presenters:
• TED-style talks are personal. The only reason to give a TED-style talk is that you feel passionately about your case and an ethics issue it raises. Your sense of mission creates energy for you and your on-line audience.
• TED-style talks often take us on a journey. As you share your transition from ignorance to understanding of some important truth(s) about your case, we’ll follow your footsteps. Your presentation should walk us through your processes of assessment and problem solving as you discovered what really mattered.
• TED-style talks are concise. Because their limited time, TED-style presenters do the hard work of cutting out any extraneous ideas so that every word counts. (BTW, clinical settings also value concise communication of necessary information.)
• TED-style talks feel important. Almost every speech presents an “aha!” moment and recounts what it feels like to break through a problem. As you reflect on your case, what was “the missing piece of the puzzle” that made problem solving possible? Was it the realization that some apparently insignificant detail “unlocked” your understanding of what was really going on in the case? Was it the “aha” you experienced when you wondered if a problem you thought you understood completely could be “re-framed” in a different way that allowed for other resolutions? Or you found an alternative solution “outside the box”?