please write plagiarism free essay, do write an undergrad student essay Read the following short stories. Choose one of them and create an argument about how the story explores a modern concern or de

please write plagiarism free essay, do write an undergrad student essay not the professional essay .Read the following short stories. Choose one of them and create an argument about how the story explores a modern concern or development related to contemporary science and technology -- through the literary genre of the short story.

Be sure to read the course material related to writing about literature.

this is the link for writing about literature 

Click https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/types-of-writing/literature/ link to open resource.

Here are the stories you can use:These all stories are from daily science fiction 

"Ten Things You Should Know Before Crossing Yourself with a Lobster so You Can Live Forever"by Thomas K Carpenter.

"A Cost-Effective Analysis for the De-Extinction of the Woolly Mammoth" by Ronald D Ferguson.

"A New Man in Time for Christmas" by Dustin Adams (content note: suicide)

"The Opposite of the Big Bang" by Nathan J Bezzina

"ApocaList: The Surprising Origin of Seven Everyday Words" by Alexei Collier.

"I Love You, and I Have the Brain Scans to Prove It," by Kara Allen.

"Please Stop Murdering Grandma," by Christine Amsden. 

Do not simply discuss or summarize the plot and do not simply argue that the story reflects some particular concern. Similarly, don't simply say that the science in the story is implausible in some way. Instead, make an argument about how the story develops a theme related to modern science. Explore its literary richness as it relates to real scientific concerns. Do not try to make the analysis easy. Aim to explore the difficulties.

Try to organize your essays based on your arguments. Do not simply go through the story paragraph by paragraph. 

You must do some secondary research on the modern science issues. Don't just provide information to fill up space in the paper. Use the science as context and evidence for the interpretation of the story.  The idea is to say that modern science involves us in a particular and interesting debate: here is how this short story participates in that debate. Here is what it wants us to consider and conclude.

Further, do not seek out others' interpretations of the story; the interpretation should be yours.

Essays should be double spaced with at least 1-inch margins. Use a sans-serif font such as Calibri, not a serif font like Times New Roman. New paragraphs should be indicated with an indent, not a space. Essays should list your name, the course code and section, and the date at the top left of the first page. Essays should have a title centred over the main text, but not a separate title page. Remember to use footnotes, not endnotes.

Submit the paper as a Word (.doc or .docx) file.

Required length: 1200 words, not including footnotes or front matter.

Criteria for Recognition

[Feedback for this paper will include an indication as to which criteria have been met.] 

Is within 10% of the assigned length, not including footnotes and front matter, and without excessive quotation.

Is formatted according to course guidelines (font, inclusion of course info, margins etc).

Has an original title (eg not “English essay” or “Assignment Two” or just the name of the story, or the like).

Has an introduction that sets out a relevant thesis—your position or intended argument (in this case what you will argue about the essay you've chosen), not simply a description of what is going to be considered. 

Has a series of body paragraphs that present relevant arguments and includes properly cited, detailed evidence (including quotations from the story you're analysing and secondary sources as needed) in each body paragraph. Notice that citations of secondary sources must be clear: it must be evident what you've taken from each source you cite. 

Has a conclusion that does NOT say "In conclusion" or "In summary" or the like. 

Has a reasonably limited number of typos and errors of grammar and style.

Avoids grammatical first person ("I have considered...") and second person ("you can see how...")

Avoids expressions of personal belief or opinion.

Avoids sub-headings 

Uses a moderate, objective tone. 

Uses footnotes for citations without a bibliography and uses them correctly according to Chicago Style and course guidelines.

Distinction

Distinction can be earned with particularly brilliant discussion and analysis.