Read the article below and answer the following questions. READ: A Modest Proposal for the Abolition of Custodial Confessions https://www.mediafire.com/file/udsim6kjc6fv3ra/A_Modest_Proposal_for_the_

Read the article below and answer the following questions. 

READ: A Modest Proposal for the Abolition of Custodial Confessions

https://www.mediafire.com/file/udsim6kjc6fv3ra/A_Modest_Proposal_for_the_Abolition_of_Custodial_Confessions.pdf/file

IN TEXT CITATION NOTE: YES, YOU MUST BOTH USE AND CITE ARGUMENTS/EVIDENCE FROM THIS ARTICLE IN YOUR ANSWERS -- BECAUSE WE HAVE JUST THE ONE READING, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO USE THE AUTHORS' NAMES IN YOUR CITATION, YOU MAY JUST PROVIDE THE PAGE NUMBER IN PARENTHESES.

1. Based on the article "A Modest Proposal", which viewpoint regarding the Miranda v. Arizona ruling do you agree with the most: the majority or the dissent? Why do you feel that way? 

2. The authors go through some post-Miranda ruling decisions up to that point. What is the strongest argument they make for not making exceptions to the Miranda ruling? What makes it the strongest argument?

3. Do you agree with the authors' proposal to exclude confessions elicited through custodial interrogations? Why or why not?