Read the GM v Johnson and the Smith v Ontario (HRC) cases. https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2005/2005canlii2811/2005canlii2811.html?

Read the GM v Johnson and the Smith v Ontario (HRC) cases. 

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2005/2005canlii2811/2005canlii2811.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQANcG9pc29uZWQgd29yawAAAAAB&resultIndex=2

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2013/2013onca502/2013onca502.html?autocompleteStr=johnson%20v%20general%20motors&autocompletePos=1

Assume you are explaining the cases to an intelligent but uniformed person about workplace law (AKA the Reasonable Person). In a few clear concise and well-written paragraphs , explain the basic facts and complaints of each case and then compare and contrast the differences in approach and outcomes between these two cases alleging racial discrimination in the workplace. For example, one is a common law court case and the other a human rights complaint, how does this difference effect, for example, the burden of proof, the analysis and the potential and actual remedies awarded?