Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
rephase the following statement: Theory Application The theory of utilitarianism is applied to physician assisted suicide by considering how this...
rephase the following statement:
Theory Application
The theory of utilitarianism is applied to physician assisted suicide by considering how this affects the patient. It is the patients wish not to continue suffering from their medical prognoses. The effects of their decisions raise their utility by allowing them to die with dignity and to no longer suffer. It creates the greatest amount of happiness for them because they are getting to choose how and when to end their life. From the point of view of a physician who is facilitating the ending of a patient's life, it can be seen as morally acceptable because they are doing what they feel is best for the patient and therefore benefiting them by doing the most good for their circumstances. They could argue that in keeping with the patient wishes they are agreeing to end suffering which is what their job entails. Morally they believe that no one should suffer, therefore their actions are right because it creates the greatest amount of good. Again for the patient it is allowing them to retain autonomy because their choices are not resulting in the harm of other. If physician assisted suicide was legal it would create the greatest amount of good by decreasing the amount of suffering that patients experience and letting them keep their dignity. The hardest thing for someone to lose is their independence and control over their life. The moral standpoint is that they are not causing harm to others; therefore they are entitled to make their own decisions. Young writes that we should respect their autonomy and that of the medical professional who is assisting, The value (or right) of self-determination does not entitle a patient to compel a medical professional to act contrary to her own moral or professional values. Hence, if voluntary euthanasia is to be legally permitted, it must be against a backdrop of respect for professional autonomy. We consider that killing out of mercy is not morally wrong.
